1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Aloiza [94]
2 years ago
6

Why couldn’t politicians formulate a long-term solution to sectional issues?

History
1 answer:
gladu [14]2 years ago
7 0
There was anger over the Alien and Sedition acts, Hamilton wanted to pay off 80% of the war debt, and the interposition of state authority over federal law were some sectional issues they faced. They could not agree.
You might be interested in
Japan has a high population density. What could that mean?
kenny6666 [7]

Answer:

b

Explanation:

There is a large urban population.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Whay contribution did al-khwarizmi make to the world of mathematics?
Natali5045456 [20]
<span>His work became the basis for algebra. is the answer</span>
6 0
2 years ago
Compare and contrast (From White Supremacy to Barak Obama: The history of the Democratic Party with (How the Republican Part Wen
erastovalidia [21]

The key theme in the video of <em>From White Supremacy to Barak Obama </em>is the history of the Democratic party and how they wanted to continue slavery and also their idea of Manifest Destiny and how the Presidency of Barack Obama came to be.

<h3>Who are Democrats and Republicans?</h3>

This refers to the party system that exists in the United States of America as they have different ideals and beliefs.

Hence, we can see that the key theme in <em>How the Republican Part Went from Lincoln to Trump</em> talks about the earlier party, the Whigs who were divided about the issue of slavery, and the emergence of the Republic Party from Abraham Lincoln.

Read more about the American party system here:

brainly.com/question/1603400

#SPJ1

6 0
2 years ago
How did Congress react to the Black Codes of the 1860s?
Alexus [3.1K]
Well Republicans were outraged and upset about these laws.
7 0
3 years ago
Why was the Battle of Bunker Hill in 1775 considered a victory for the Continental army? The Continental army maintained its con
Shalnov [3]

Explanation:

The Battle of Bunker Hill was fought on June 17, 1775, during the Siege of Boston in the early stages of the American Revolutionary War. The battle is named after Bunker Hill in Charlestown, Massachusetts, which was peripherally involved in the battle. It was the original objective of both the colonial and British troops, though the majority of combat took place on the adjacent hill which later became known as Breed's Hill.

On June 13, 1775, the leaders of the colonial forces besieging Boston learned that the British were planning to send troops out from the city to fortify the unoccupied hills surrounding the city, which would give them control of Boston Harbor. In response, 1,200 colonial troops under the command of William Prescott stealthily occupied Bunker Hill and Breed's Hill. During the night, the colonists constructed a strong redoubt on Breed's Hill, as well as smaller fortified lines across the Charlestown Peninsula.

By daybreak of June 17, the British became aware of the presence of colonial forces on the Peninsula and mounted an attack against them that day. Two assaults on the colonial positions were repulsed with significant British casualties; the third and final attack carried the redoubt after the defenders ran out of ammunition. The colonists retreated to Cambridge over Bunker Hill, leaving the British in control of the Peninsula.

The battle was a tactical, though somewhat Pyrrhic, victory for the British,as it proved to be a sobering experience for them, involving many more casualties than the Americans had incurred, including many officers. The battle had demonstrated that inexperienced militia were able to stand up to regular army troops in battle. Subsequently, the battle discouraged the British from any further frontal attacks against well defended front lines. American casualties were comparatively much fewer, although their losses included General Joseph Warren and Major Andrew McClary, the final casualty of the battle.

The battle led the British to adopt a more cautious planning and maneuver execution in future engagements, which was evident in the subsequent New York and New Jersey campaign, and arguably helped rather than hindered the American forces. Their new approach to battle was actually giving the Americans greater opportunity to retreat if defeat was imminent. The costly engagement also convinced the British of the need to hire substantial numbers of Hessian auxiliaries to bolster their strength in the face of the new and formidable Continental Army.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • At what conference did the Allies set the terms for the Japanese surrender?
    13·2 answers
  • ANSWER IS BELOW: What was US reaction to the Cuban Revolution?
    8·2 answers
  • Who was the first ruler of the Tang Dynasty?
    8·2 answers
  • The british army used mercenaries called what a heathens d hessians c russians d ruffians
    5·2 answers
  • To whom is Lincoln referring when he says “my dissatisfied fellow countrymen”?
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the these was a precedent set by the first President of the United States, George Washington?
    10·2 answers
  • Where did most of the population live under feudalism in Europe
    15·1 answer
  • Why did colonists fear creating a federal government that was too strong
    15·2 answers
  • How was Lincoln the right President, in the right time, at the right place?
    11·1 answer
  • The people in which civilization worshipped Huitzilopochtli?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!