Answer:
the government can clearly justify the restriction
Explanation:
According to the Supreme Court, prior restraint on the press is only acceptable if the government can clearly justify the restriction. Otherwise the government cannot add any restrictions against the press because they have freedom of speech and of the press. Which if violated would cause an uproar of the people and lead to many protests.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
c. bogus pipeline
Explanation:
Bogus pipeline is a type of polygraph used in situations where individuals need to answer emotional questions. This device is widely used by psychologists because it allows the identification and reduction of false responses on the part of the participant. In other words, we can say that this device allows the participant to be connected to a device that measures "true attitudes" to check if a participant has any hidden biases
According to the chart of phases of marital satisfaction in the text, the point in the marriage is the level of satisfaction at its peak is when the couple is retired.
Building a successful marriage is a challenge. Satisfaction appears to be a correspondence between the expected and the actual of a relationship according to Burgess and Locke.
Answer:
A. Pregnant women, prisoners, children
Explanation:
The groups that are protected in the federal regulations (45 CFR 46), specifically in Subparts B, C, and D with additional protections are <em>pregnant women, prisoners, children. </em>In Federal Regulations, Protection of Human Subjects involved in research. Pregnant women and fetuses, prisoners and children.
Answer:
Fictitious payee rule
Explanation:
Fictitious payee rule applies when a person cause an instrument to be issued to a person(payee) who has no valid reason to receive the payment or no interest in the instrument, this ensure forgery of the payee's name will then be effective to pass the instrument to the transferees later as we can see in the case of Maria, she included the name of her maid for the purpose of using the check for herself and not for the sake of Carolyn