1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
katrin [286]
3 years ago
6

What did the economic prosperity of the 1920s provide more of, to many Americans?

History
2 answers:
sweet [91]3 years ago
8 0
It provided them with more Leisure time and more spending money.
Flura [38]3 years ago
5 0
In 1929 the American economy appeared healthy. For many groups of Americans the prosperity of the 1920’s was a cruel illusion
You might be interested in
What was the result for African Americans who fought for better rights and fairer pay in the Pacific Northwest?
Stella [2.4K]

Answer:

They were fired and forced to move east.

8 0
3 years ago
Who benefited from the transactions that became known as the Teapot Dome Scandal? A) Charles Forbes and private contractors B)Al
Verdich [7]

Answer:

The Answer is Albert B. Fall and some executives of petroleum companies.

Explanation:

The Teapot Dome Scandal was a bribery incident that took place in the United States from 1921 to 1922, during the administration of President Warren G. Harding.

The upshot of the Teapot Dome Scandal was the accusation that Harding's Secretary of the Interior, Albert Fall, had bypassed the open bid process in awarding leases for government oil land to private oil companies.

When these leases and contracts came under investigation by committees of the U.S. Senate, it was disclosed that shortly after the signing of the Teapot Dome lease, Fall and members of his family had received from an unknown source more than $200,000 in Liberty bonds under circumstances indicating that the bonds came from a company organized by Sinclai.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
One reason Common Sense was so accessible to American colonists was that it was only ten pages long. printed in local newspapers
Katarina [22]
Written in plan language!
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
At the time of the constitution convention. The constitution gave congress the authority to veto state laws
Vlad1618 [11]

Answer: False

Explanation:

During the Constitutional Convention, several ideas were thrown around for what the Constitution should look like including the Virginia plan. The Virginia plan called for several things in the Constitution today such as the Bicameral legislature that the U.S. currently has.

It also however, called for Congress to be able to veto state laws. This was rejected by the Convention as most delegates believed that states should be able to be independent of the Federal government.

4 0
3 years ago
briefly describe one major difference between beard’s and berkin’s historical interpretations of the drafting of the united stat
Daniel [21]

One of the main differences of interpretation between Charles Beard and Carol Berkin is their point of view on the Constitution and the founding fathers.

Charles Beard is the author of An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of the United States. In this work published in 1913, the author argued that the Constitution of the United States was formulated to serve the interests of wealthy members of the upper class of society.

One of his most controversial statements is his claim about the Founding Fathers, whom he points out as belonging to the upper-class group and who wrote the Constitution to defend their rights and interests.

On the other hand, Carol Berkin is the author of the book The Bill of Rights: The Fight to Secure America's Liberties, published in 2015. In this book, she exposes her interpretation of the process of creation of the Declaration of Independence and the Declaration of Rights.

Her interpretation of these historical events is framed in a vision of the founding fathers as mere mortals who ignored the possibility that the new government they were building would last for many years.

Based on the above, it can be inferred that Carol Berkin and Charles Beard have different views of the Constitution and the founding fathers such as:

  • Charles considers that they wrote the constitution for their convenience.
  • Carol describes them as ordinary people who wanted to change their situation and establish a government for all.

Learn more in: brainly.com/question/1992478

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the civil war affect life in Texas?
    15·1 answer
  • What happened to the former colonial possessions of europe?
    12·2 answers
  • describe the disagreement between the federalists and the anti-federalists concerning how to ensure national security​
    5·1 answer
  • 14)Compared to market economies, command economies are more effective at advancing which economic goal?
    15·1 answer
  • Rosa Park and The Montgomery Bus -compare these personal accounts with the "factual" or "documented" history of the era.
    10·1 answer
  • Do you think the second wave feminist movement achieved its goals? Why or why not?
    9·1 answer
  • 3) list 2 things Mussolini's conquest in Africa proved regarding the League of nations, England and France?
    12·1 answer
  • HELP PLEASE, A.S.A.P.....!
    9·1 answer
  • "Each looked for an easier triumph, and a result less fundamental and astounding. Both read the same Bible and pray to the same
    6·1 answer
  • What was the purpose of the Black Codes? A: to restrict the rights of formerly enslaved people B: to provide formerly enslaved p
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!