1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vova2212 [387]
3 years ago
14

The number of electoral votes for a president is equal to

History
2 answers:
const2013 [10]3 years ago
7 0
It is 270 needed out of a possible 538 since 1964
Korvikt [17]3 years ago
5 0
420 lo siento escuchar que
You might be interested in
Zoroastrianism developed in which ancient empire?
Georgia [21]

Answer:

D. Persian

Explanation:

Zoroastrianism is a religion which was developed by the ancient empire Persia.

In Zoroastrianism:

The king is the ultimate representative of the superpower which the believers of the religion believe is god.

Hope this helps ;) ❤❤❤

8 0
3 years ago
What does the Magistrate Court do / what power does the magistrate hold .
NNADVOKAT [17]

Answer:

1

Explanation:

a triangle has three sides and three angles and a rectangle has 4 sides so the formula is n-3 . no in this case equals 4 so 4-3=1

5 0
2 years ago
briefly describe the similarities between the feudal economic structure of medieval europe and medieval japan
Alona [7]
How Japanese Castles are similar to European Castles
1.They had large and tall walls for protection
2. They often had moats around them to discourage the digging of tunnels
3. They had narrow and steep stairways to make assault difficult
4. They had portholes for guns and for arrows
5. They often had a main gate area that could be used as a trap
6. They almost always had concentric rings of walls to give them multiple layers of protection
7.They capitalized on terrain features - often the best placement was at the top of a hill or small mountain. This gave a very advantageous position and view

DIFFERENCES
Unlike European feudalism Japan’s feudalism system did not have a true pyramid form with the monarch presiding over the less important nobles.

First, the authority in Japan was much less centralized than it was in the nation-states of Europe. Even though most of the local aristocrats paid lip service to the emperor, the rugged terrain of Japan made it very difficult for the emperor to fully control the local aristocracy. Therefore the local aristocrats had much more power in Japan than they ever had in France, Britain, or any other European country.

Secondly, even though the lower nobility in Japan (the samurai) swore fealty to their local lords, the local lords didn’t give the samurai any land of their own. When the European nobility receives land in exchange for their military services, the samurai did not join a landowning hierarchy. Instead of that they were given an independent income from their local lord based upon what that lord’s lands produced.

In contrast, European knights usually had their own serfs to work the land the knights received from their lord. While a Japanese samurai might have had servants, these servants did not work the land the way they would have done in Europe.  









8 0
3 years ago
Which statement describes a difference between authoritarian government
artcher [175]

Answer:

D

Explanation: In D , it states in a constitutional gov't there is a power limit and there laws that can can limit or restrict how much power GOV'T can have

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
For a large part of the 20th century, only a small part of the population in South Africa had a say in the government. Certain r
Stella [2.4K]
Yes, oligarchy fits as a description of South African government under the system of apartheid.  In the political philosophy of Aristotle, "aristocracy" is "rule by the excellent ones," and in certain eras of history or in some societies, one group or another has been portrayed as more "excellent" and thus more favorable for serving as governors.  In Aristotle's political thought, an "oligarchy" or "rule by a few" is a corruption of the idea of aristocracy.  But Aristotle was biased, believing that by nature some persons are more excellent than others, that some are more suited by nature to be followers, not leaders. (Aristotle used such logic in defending the institution of slavery, for instance.)   Today, we might argue that any sort of "aristocracy" or elitism is always an oligarchy, an arbitrary system in which a few dominate over the many because of factors that can't rationally be defended.

For another answer on a similar question, read more on Brainly.com - brainly.com/question/9475348#readmore
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The industrial revolution began in Great Britain partly because economist there:
    11·2 answers
  • Which description best describes the caste System in India
    14·2 answers
  • What battle did Americans lead a surprise, victorious attack against German Hessians on Christmas night after crossing the Delaw
    10·1 answer
  • According to the declaration of independence what should people do when the government abuses it's power
    10·1 answer
  • You pick up a newspaper and are disappointed to find that part of the headline is missing. It reads, "__________ appoints new Su
    14·2 answers
  • Why were the greek so strict?
    8·1 answer
  • What caused Siddhartha Gautama to seek wisdom?
    13·2 answers
  • According to some historians, which marks the beginning of the US Civil War?
    6·2 answers
  • 1. Jesus gave His life as a ransom for many Luke 2:40 2. "Glorify thy Son, that thy Son also may glorify thee." John 17:1 3. the
    14·1 answer
  • Name the island through which the Tropic of Capricorn runs.
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!