Hey I don't know the answer but I need pointsss:/
The argument above is a deductive reasoning. A deductive reasoning draws a conclusion from a series of premises that are held to be true. The argument also employs no informal fallacy. The confusion lies though on the first premise if it is true.
Answer:
C). Shannon's physician gives her some pain medication and tells her not to drive after she takes it, as the medication induces drowsiness. In spite of the doctor's warning, Shannon decides to drive to the store while on the medication. Owing to her lack of alertness, she fails to stop at a traffic light and crashes into another vehicle, causing a passenger in that vehicle to be injured.
Explanation:
Negligence is defined as the 'tort whereby a duty of reasonable or standard care as defined by law is breached, causing damage or any conduct short of .'
In the above situation, Shanon was aware of the after-effects of the medication she took as her physician instructs her to not drive because she may feel drowsy. Despite this warning, her decision to drive to the store reflects her negligence i.e. 'intentional action that falls below the legal standard for preventing unreasonable damage or harm.' Thus, <u>option C</u> is the correct answer.
Answer:
P V = 1669,5
Explanation:
After seven years, future payment will be 9800$ and from there on we will have 23 annual payments more:
P V = 9800/(1+0.08)^23 = 9800/5,87 = 1669,5
Answer:
The amount of Best Buy's cost of goods sold was $32,720 million
Explanation:
cost of goods sold = sales - gross profit
= $42,410 million - $9,690 million
= $32,720 million
Therefore, The amount of Best Buy's cost of goods sold was $32,720 million
