The <span>professed aim of the daughters of Liberty was to show patriotism by boycotting British goods that implemented taxes on the colonists, since many viewed such taxes as being unfair since the colonists didn't have representation in Parliament. </span>
The “Butterfly Effect” is a valid concept whereby a small change to initial conditions in complex systems can lead to huge changes later on. The thought-experiment is that a butterfly flapping its wings in one location can, over time, lead to very different weather in a far distant location, as compared to if the butterfly had not flapped its wings. This term initially arose when an early experiment in weather simulation models showed a vastly different outcome when the simulation was restarted with values whose changes were below anything that could be measured at the time in reality — thus showing that effects too small to detect can magnify.
The “Mandela Effect”, on the other hand, is a fetid pile of dingo’s kidneys that is a fancy way of noting human memory is fallible and that false memories are reinforced through repetition. The human brain has a bad case of “sunk cost” fallacy, and rather than admit to itself it has been remembering something incorrectly for decades, would rather believe in parallel universe intruding into daily life on a regular basis. (The human brain is also lazy, or if you prefer, “efficient”, so it merges similar memories together, thus freeing up some storage space for other things and improving search time. For most of our actual needs, “close enough” works; it doesn’t matter that Kirk never actually said “Beam me up, Scotty” in the original series.)
The 95 thesis was posted by Martin Luther, asking for drastic changes in the Catholic church's teachings and how they followed the Bible. Soon after this, Luther split away from the Catholic Church and created his own, now known as the Lutheran Church.
Hope this helps
Answer:
the share of income received by the wealthiest one percent of Americans rose from 12 percent to 19 percent, while the share received by the richest five percent jumped from 24 percent to 34
Answer:
Ghenhis khan would kill the eintire city
Explanation:
he was a ruthless leader
