Answer:
The two main problems that the settlers of Virginia face was an inability to properly farm to the extent where they had enough food, and hostile Native Americans, whose patience had run thin with the settlers who were always trying to expand their settlement.
Explanation:
Answer:
a) it could be produced easily and quickly.
Explanation:
In the colonial times of the 17th century, tobacco was "a poor man´s crop" and sugar was " a rich man´s crop," and these were the two main crops in the English settlements in the West Indies. Tobacco was easy to plant, to cultivate and its processing was not complicated. It didn´t require a large labor force per acre.
Answer:
Explanation:
The problem is they don't. One day you will take a history class that talks about Hiroshima or the Holocaust. They were both tragedies of a kind that is almost impossible to record with no bias.
But what would happen if you read the history from another point of view. Suppose, which I don't think has been done in any school in North America, you were to read about Hiroshima from the point of view of the Japanese. What have they said about it? What will they teach their children? What is the folklore about it from their point of view? Undoubtedly their best historians will record it without bias, but will be the same as what we read? I'm not entirely sure.
That does not answer your question, but I have grave doubts that it is possible. Personal bias always comes into everything. I will say this about your question: we must do our best to present the facts in an unbiased manner. That's important because we need to have a true picture of what happened. Many times it is because historians don't want humanity committing the same errors as the events they are trying to make sense of.
So far we have not dropped an atomic weapon on anyone else. But there have been holocausts after the European one. What have we learned? That six million is a number beyond our understanding, and we have not grasped the enormity of the crime, bias or no bias.
The scientific method <em>revolutionized the study of human society</em> during the Gilded Age and onward; sparking curiosity within the members of society, and encouraged people to <em>gain knowledge</em>, discover and investigate; causing them to question old credence, and starting to prove them wrong, thus <em>leading to technological advances</em>, and large scale production methods, the inception of intellectual movements and favored <em>drastic reforms in education</em>, thus bringing opportunities to other scope of the population, because racial, ethnic, religious, gender and socioeconomic inequalities still abounded, so it also inspired some reformers to address those inequities in some form.
