This excerpt directly supports cugoano’s belief that all good christians have to participate "and of every man that has any claim or affinity to the name of Christian"
The abolition of slavery is the moral and obligatory duty of "every man that has any claim or affinity to the name of Christian," as the aforementioned text detail in the excerpt from "Thoughts and Sentiments" reflects.
This text detail most appropriately supports Cugoano's belief that "All Good Christians who are enlightened must participate in the abolition of slavery."
This textual detail supports the author's assertion. He claims that this human trafficking, often known as slavery
cannot be tolerated anywhere or to any extent and that enlightened Christians must step forward to end this cruel treatment of Africans. He contends that people must accept this inhumane deed since it is against sensibility and humanity and that it must be stopped.
So, choose option B.
Learn more about Christians brainly.com/question/3749222
#SPJ4
I think that this is a very hard question to answer. I think that many kings, fictional or not, possess both the bad and good traits of being a king.
In regards to Macbeth, he certainly possessed the ambition many would wish for a king. He was brave, as noted by Duncan and the title of the Thane of Cawdor. He was protective, as noted by his murder of Banquo. Macbeth was even proud, as seen by his desire to keep the new title of Thane before taking the crown.
Unfortunately, many of the characteristics one would align with being a good king made Macbeth a bad king as well. Macbeth was too ambitious--as seen by his murdering Duncan. He was too protective--as seen by his inability to interpret the apparitions warnings in the correct way. Lastly, he was too proud--as seen by his refusal to leave the castle as Birnam Wood "moved" against him.
Like anything, one must always have control. Too much of anything normally turns out to be a bad thing. Therefore, depending upon one's individual views, Macbeth could be both a bad king or a good one.
BTW: It's free real estate.
Answer:
By the end of the novel, nick leaves the east for the midwest because he views the midwest as a place of traditional values and attention to morality.
Explanation:
Nick Carraway is the narrator in the novel "The Great Gatsby" by F. Scott Fitzgerald. By the end of the story, he returns to the midwest, leaving the east after going through a great deal. While living close to New York and after mingling with the high society from that time, Nick has seen it all. All types of sins, criminals accusing criminals, betrayers pointing fingers at betrayers. He has seen a world of vapid people whose only purpose is to party their troubles away. They drink, dance, gossip, have affairs, and despise one another, all in an effort to forget their own faults, their own sadness. After the main character, Gatsby, is killed as a result of a provoked misunderstanding, Nick has had enough. He's done with the hypocrisy of the wealthy. He goes back to a place of traditional values and attention to morality.
Answer holdup Eliza what?
Explanation:
Answer is the option <span>A. (0.9, 2.4)</span>
