Answer:
1. By stating that "preserving critical habitat" is a conservation priority.
Explanation:
The above option truly reveals how the author show that the declining population of painted buntings is linked to habitat loss.
This is true because the author believes that there are critical habitats that must be preserved for the percentage in declination to be resolved. Also, since the author stated preservation of critical habitat as a conservation priority, this makes it very clear that the declining population of painted buntings is linked to habitat loss. I believe that what is a priority is solving a major problem that has been identified.
Answer:
Abuse
Explanation:
Let is first define both of these terms.
Abuse is a cruel or unfair treatment of a person or an animal. It can be physical, emotional, verbal, psychological abuse etc.
Chemical restraint is use of medications in order to restrict someone's behavior or the freedom of movement.
In this particular exemple, we see that a staff person locked a patient for not wanting to take his medicines. Although, it's connected to medicines, from the explanations above, we can conclude that this is noy a case of chemical restraint, but a clear case of an abuse.
Answer: grandeur
Explanation:
In Beowulf, Heorot is known to be Hrothgar's mead-hall, where the warriors eat and drink. The hall was also used by Beowulf to defend against the monster.
The hero saved Heorot as it prevented Grendel from attacking it. Heorot's quallties that the lines depict is grandeur. Heorot was referred to as the greatest of hall-buildings
<span>Women are the main breadwinners in two-thirds of families across the country. - Valid reasoning. This does support the argument by showing the damage the unequal pay does not only to those women, but also to their families.
</span><span>Employers pay different workers different salaries based on skill level. - Invalid reasoning. Women don't demand to be paid more than the men who happen to have better skills, but simply to be paid equally when they have equal skills.
</span><span>Paying people different salaries for the same work is discrimination. - Valid reasoning. That is the basic argument, leveled up. It would be the same as paying all blue-haired men more than the brown or black-haired, when they are doing the same work, with the same skills.
</span><span>Women's incomes are needed for the survival of their families. - Valid reasoning. Just like in the first case, this one shows that this issue doesn't only concern women, but their families - finally, their husbands, the very ones who are paid better for equal work.
</span><span><span>Women are ready to fight back against pay discrimination. - Invalid reasoning. This doesn't have anything to do with the issue itself. It is just a reaction to it, but it doesn't support it.</span>
</span>
