1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kobusy [5.1K]
3 years ago
5

The federal government levies _____________________________ on people who pass assets ____________________________, either after

death or during life.
A. an estate and gift tax; to the next generation
B. a regressive tax; to non-family members
C. an excise tax; to their children
D. a progressive tax; to non-family members
Business
1 answer:
Ierofanga [76]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The answer is A: an estate and gift tax; to the next generation

Explanation:

A deceased person often via a will or according to laws of intestacy  transfers the benefit and ownership of an estate to relatives or others without any consideration. the tax paid on such a transferred asset is called estate tax. This type of tax is often imposed on the property. But practice differs as some tax jurisdictions do impose estate tax on the beneficiary of the deceased property in which case it is called inheritance tax.

Such a tax is not to be imposed if the property is bequeathed to a spouse or a charity recognized under the Federal laws.

When an individual transfers properties during his life time to another without receiving full consideration in any form in return, the tax imposed on such transfer of ownership of asset is known as gift tax. The tax is usually imposed on the giver or transferor of the assets unless a retention of an interest exist which will likely delay the completion of the gift

The major difference between an estate tax and gift tax is that estate tax is tax on transfer of property without consideration to others after demise or death. Gift tax is a tax on transfer of ownership of property without consideration during the giver's lifetime (often called an inter vivos gift)

You might be interested in
A market has four individuals, each considering buying a grill. Assume that grills come in only one size and model. Martina cons
artcher [175]

Answer:

Martina

Javier :

Kama

Explanation:

The people that would participate in the market are those whose willingness to pay is higher than the market price for the grill.

The willingness to pay is the highest amount a person would be willing to pay for a good

Martina : $400 > $300  would participate

Javier : $350 > $300 would participate

Kama : $320 > $300 would participate

Lina : $200 < $300 would not participate

5 0
3 years ago
Speculator paid $25,000 net each for two 150 front-foot lots. Speculator split them into 3 lots with equal front footage. Specul
ankoles [38]

Answer:

The answer is 80%

Explanation:

Profit = revenue - cost of sales

         =[(50* 300) per 50 front-foot lot * 3 lots ] - 25000   *100

         =(45000-25000)/25000    *100

         <u>=80%</u>

5 0
3 years ago
Your firm (an Australian firm) makes a sale to a Japanese customer.  The sale price is 200 million Japanese Yen payable in exact
charle [14.2K]

Answer:

An Australian Firm Selling to a Japanese Customer

a) Direct Quote of the Exchange Rate between Australian Dollar and Japanese Yen:

A$ 1 = ¥90

Meaning 1 Australian Dollar = 90 Japanese Yen.

Therefore, the price of the goods would be A$ 2,222,222.22222 (¥200 million)/ ¥90

b)Theoretical Current Forward Exchange Rate, quoted in terms of JPY/AUD for delivery in three months:

= Spot Rate x (1 + Japanese Interest Rate) / (1 + Australian Interest Rate) x 360/90

= ¥90 x (1 +0.005) / (1 +0.03) x 360/90 = ¥90 x 1.005/1.03 x 360/90

= ¥351.26214 =A$1

c) The Australian firm can take advantage of any decreases in the exchange rate and also ensure that it receives at least Australian $2 million by entering into a Currency Forwards Contract.

d) If the spot exchange rate in 3 month's time is:

(i) AUD/JPY=150, the outcome of the hedging with a Currency Forwards Contract to get at least A$ 2 million would be the gain of:

Forward Exchange outcome in Australian Dollars = ¥200 million/ ¥150 =

A$ 1,333,333.33333

Hedging outcome minus Forward Exchange outcome

A$2 million - A$ 1,333,333.33333 = A$666,666.66667

(ii) AUD/JPY = 50, the outcome of the hedging with a Currency Forwards Contract to get at least A$ 2 million would be the loss of:

Forward  Exchange outcome =  in Australian Dollars = ¥200 million/ ¥50 =

A$4 million

Hedging outcome minus Forward Exchange outcome

A$2 million - $4 million = -A$2million

Explanation:

a) Currency forwards contracts and future contracts are used to hedge the currency risk. For example, a company expecting to receive  ¥200 million in 90 days, can enter into a forward contract to deliver the  ¥200 million and receive equivalent Australian dollars in 90 days at an exchange rate specified today.

b) If A$ 1 = ¥90

Therefore, the price of the goods would be A$ 2,222,222.22222 (¥200 million)/ ¥90 in Australian Dollars.

5 0
3 years ago
Maria has to choose between driving and taking a train to destination A. Travelling by train will cost her $400 and will take 4
dlinn [17]

Answer:

None of the options are correct

Explanation:

The train would cost her, which is computed as:

= Cost + (Hours × Opportunity Cost)

= $400 + (4 hours × $15 per hour)

= $400 + $60

= $460

The driving would cost her, which is computed as:

= Cost + (Hours × Opportunity Cost)

= $250 + (6 hours × $15 per hour)

= $250 + $90

= $340

Savings = Train Cost - Driving Cost

= $460 - $340

=$120

None of the options are correct as the she would save $120.

4 0
3 years ago
It takes Anne 3 hours to make a pie and 4 hours to make a shirt. It takes Mary 2 hours to make a pie and 5 hours to make a shirt
mina [271]

Answer:

False

Explanation:

An economic agent should specialise in the production of the good for which it has a comparative advantage in its production.

An economic agent has a comparative advantage in production if it produces at a lower opportunity cost when compared with other economic agents.

Anne's opportunity cost in pie production = 4/3=1.33

Anne's opportunity cost in shirt production = 3/4 = 0.75

Mary's opportunity cost in pie production = 5/2 = 2.5

Mary's opportunity cost in shirt production = 2/5 = 0.4

Anne has a comparative advantage in the production of pies and Mary has a comparative advantage in the production of shirts.

Anne should specialise in pie production and Mary should specialise in shirt production.

I hope my answer helps you

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Diego is in the Strange Situation with his caregiver; he explores the room and examines the toys that have been placed in it. He
    7·1 answer
  • Holton Company makes three products in a single facility. Data concerning these products follow:
    6·1 answer
  • A.J. is the vice president for Keane Products, a marketing consulting firm. On a business trip to New York City in 2019, he meet
    7·1 answer
  • A major accounting contribution to the managerial decision-making process in evaluating possible courses of action is to a. assi
    10·1 answer
  • Job interviewers often say to job applicants, "tell me about yourself." the purpose of this request is to:
    8·1 answer
  • How do the characteristics of management decisions-uncertainty, risk, conflict, and lack of structure- affect the decision facin
    13·1 answer
  • Blossom Company purchased a machine with a list price of $168000. They were given a 10% discount by the manufacturer. They paid
    13·1 answer
  • Kit-N-Sit and Kittysitters are two cat-sitting services in Kent, Ohio. There are no other cat-sitting services, so the market is
    10·1 answer
  • Strategic planning: a. requires managers to set short-term goals to increase market share. b. involves integrating all of the pr
    7·1 answer
  • Business email messages should
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!