1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jekas [21]
3 years ago
7

Who studies artifacts scientifically? An anthropologist or an archaeologist

History
2 answers:
fomenos3 years ago
4 0
An archaeologist studies artifacts scientifically.
joja [24]3 years ago
3 0
The answer would be archaeologist. An archaeologist is a person who studies human history and prehistory through the excavation of sites and the analysis of artifacts and other physical remains.
On the other hand, an anthropologist would take a broad approach to understanding the many different aspects of the human experience, which we call holism. They consider the past, through archaeology, to see how human groups lived hundreds or thousands of years ago and what was important to them.
You might be interested in
Which of the following was a direct result of the Yalta Conference in 1945?
vovangra [49]
The answer is a) the division of germany.
3 0
2 years ago
What types of issues are dealt with by family law?
daser333 [38]

Answer:

The most common issues handled at family court include:

Marriage Dissolution.

Paternity and Child Custody.

Protection Orders Against Domestic Violence.

Name Changes.

Guardianship.

Termination of Parental Rights and Adoptions.

Juvenile Matters.

Emancipation and Approval of Underage Marriages.

HOPE IT HELPED, GOD BLESS YOU!

5 0
3 years ago
Settlers often volunteered to move to new colonies in order to have access to land that they would not have obtained if they had
PolarNik [594]
True. There were many colonies that had policies that allowed newcomers to get land for free. The only thing they had to do is work on it and grow crops and have farms, and after a while the land would completely become theirs and they wouldn't have to work on it anymore if they didn't want to.
4 0
3 years ago
What is better for the United States — a two-party system or a system without organized political parties? Be sure to give valid
Sedaia [141]
Pros of Having Political Parties: Members of the governmental bodies can more easily predict the outcomes of debates based on the beliefs of the parties Compromises can be made based on more distinct opinions of groups Cons of Having Political Parties: Officials act in order to aid the party, rather than the people It is more difficult for compromises to be made when a legislative body is so divided Not all people agree with every aspect of their political party, and their opinions are not represented in full by the party
6 0
3 years ago
What city did the Chinese restrict trade with Europeans?
puteri [66]

Answer: Guangzhou

Explanation: They restricted trade with them because of their religion

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the economic term for the money that is received from the sale of goods and services?
    14·2 answers
  • 2. What type of democracy is where people govern themselves by voting on all issues
    15·1 answer
  • Why was Chinese silk valued
    5·1 answer
  • Eleventh Amendment immunity may be abrogated by Congress under which of these powers:
    7·2 answers
  • Whsat was one problem the us was suffering when jfk became president
    15·1 answer
  • Which newly developed weapon helped soldiers advance through baibe
    15·1 answer
  • Who is Peter Parker?
    6·1 answer
  • !!WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!! Imagine you are a reporter. Your newspaper editor wants a story on a major event that occurred during J
    8·1 answer
  • According to Adam Smith, why were mercantilist policies that limited trade<br> unwise?
    5·1 answer
  • What does the quote from Pericles suggest about Athens?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!