Necesitas ayuda con una pregunta?
Answer:
Remedies
a. The suing party is called the plaintiff. The party being sued is the defendant. Therefore, since Arthur Rabe wants to sue Xavier Sanchez. Rabe is the Plainttiff and Sanchez is the Defendant.
b. If Rabe wants Sanchez to perform the agreement as promised, Rabe would seek remedy of Specific performance of Contract from the Court. Failure to do so will attract charges.
c. If Rabe wants the contract to be cancelled, then Rabe would ask the court for a rescission which is the cancellation of a contractual obligation.
d. The term remedies refers to a legal means to enforce a right or redress a wrong. Remedies of law include land, items of value or money. Remedies in equity includes specific performance, injunction and rescission. Thus, both remedies in part b and c are remedies in equity.
e. The party appealing a case is called the appellant or petitioner while the appellee is the party against whom the appeal is taken. So Sanchez would be the appellant and Rabe would be the respondent.
Answer:
e. Agenda Setting
Explanation:
Agenda setting refers to a practice adopted by news channels to place higher emphasis on a news, and making it appear important by consistently and repetitively covering such news.
Such a practice influences an individual's thoughts not with what he/she thinks, but what he/she should think about and consider important.
Through such a practice, the news channels underline the extent to which an issue is important i.e assign significance and importance to an issue by affecting the perceptive mindset of the viewer.
So if a political issue gets covered and getting telecast too frequently, it affects the viewers interpretation regarding the sensitivity or significance of the issue.
Many a times, through agenda setting, the media indirectly feeds it's own biased views in the thought process of the viewers. So rather than making the viewer think on his own and assign weight-age, the media itself assigns importance to an issue.
In the given case, the cable news channel preferred the topic of senator's financial indiscretion over a congressional legislation which wasn't passed. So the channel emphasized upon one issue which as per it was more important than the other and thus follows agenda setting.
Answer:
Year 1 ending inventory is overstated and year 1 cost of goods sold is understated
Explanation:
The amount of ending inventory is increased by $ 5000 so the ending inventory is overstated and the cost of goods sold is understated as an amount of additional $ 5000 is deducted from it. For better understanding we consider the following
Opening Inventory $ 15000
Purchases $ 50,000
<u>Ending Inventory $ 20,000</u>
Cost Of Goods Sold = $ 45,000
Suppose we write $ 20,000 as $ 25,000 we get
Opening Inventory $ 15000
Purchases $ 50,000
<u>Ending Inventory $ 25,000</u>
Cost Of Goods Sold = $ 40,000
So we see that Year 1 ending inventory is overstated and year 1 cost of goods sold is understated by an amount of $ 5000