Answer:
marginal benefit
Explanation:
consumers are most likely going to buy something with value
Answer:
$18,000
Explanation:
The computation of overall effect on the company's monthly net operating income is shown below:-
Current Proposed
Sales $800,000 $837,000
(200 × 4000) (200 - 14) × (4,000 + 500)
Variable expenses $160,000 $180,000
(40 × 4000) (40 × (4,000 + 500))
Contribution margin $640,000 $657,000
Fixed expenses $531000 $566,000
($531,000 + $35,000)
Net operating
income $109,000 $91,000
Decrease in net operating income = Current - Proposed
= $109,000 - $91,000
= $18,000
So, for computing the overall effect on the company's monthly net operating income we simply applied the above formula.
Answer:
$1,593,535.83
Explanation:
Future Value of mortgage determines the future value of a mortgage after payments have been made, at a regular frequency, charged a regular rate of interest, compounded at payment dates.
DATA
PV = $1,500,000
N = 24
r = 0.04/12
PMT = $1250
FV =?
Solution
PV = (PMT/r)*[1 – 1/(1 + r)^N] + FV/(1 + r)^N
1,500,000 = (1250/(0.04/12)) * (1 – 1/(1 + 0.04/12)^24) + FV/(1 + 0.04/12)^24
1,500,000 = 28785.31353687 + 0.92323916 FV
FV = (1,500,000 - 28785.31353687)/ 0.92323916
FV = $1,593,535.83
Answer:
Path-Goal Leadership Theory
Explanation:
Path-Goal Leadership Theory -
This theory was given by Robert House , in the year 1971 .
It refers to the type of leadership theory , where the behavior of the leader depends on the performance , motivation and satisfaction of the other employees , is referred to as the path - goal leadership theory .
It is also referred to as path–goal theory of leader effectiveness .
Hence , from the given information of the question ,
The correct answer is Path-Goal Leadership Theory .
Answer:
consequential damages
Explanation:
According to my research on different types of law suits, I can say that based on the information provided within the question Bill can recover the 900 he lost from Carl as consequential damages. These are damages have happened because of one party's failure to meet a certain deadline or contractual obligation and can be proven in court. Therefore since Bill can prove that he lost the 900 because of Carl's negligence he will most likely win that case.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
