Answer:
<h3>The correct answer would be the doctrine of federal preemption.</h3>
Explanation:
Clause II of Article VI of the U.S. Constitution states that federal law is the "supreme law of the land." It implies that every judge of state and other courts must follow the federal laws of the Constitution.
This clause, often termed as Supremacy Clause, allow federal laws to preempt state laws, even when both the state and federal governments have concurrent authority over a particular subject.
The doctrine of federal preemption simply implies that higher court may arrogate the law of a lower court if the two authorities come into conflict.
Answer:
was not a new energy source that was developed to power the new machinery
Traditionalistic culture tends to see the government as an absolute ruler.
In the past, Government had the capability to impose iron fist law to a nation regardless of the opinion of the citizens.
In modern years, a term 'public servants' is much more suitable in describing the role of the Government, since the people are the one basically pay their salary.
Pretty sure it’s a juror who knows the defendant as whatever they decide on could be biased so they would want to remove them from the court.
