How did king respond to the charge that the protests in birmingham were "unwise and untimely"? how would you respond? what ratio
nale did king offer for his actions? why did he think that the struggle against segregation could not be confined to courtrooms and polite negotiations?
<span>King responded to
suggestion that the Birmingham protests were untimely by stating that Albert
Boutwell was not different enough to warrant patience. He further states that
privileged groups are always certain to oppose any action that threatens the
status quo. King justified his actions by stating that an individual has the
right to reject unjust laws, and that the black community had waited more than
340 years for justice.</span>
I would respond to the
claim that the protests were untimely by stating that the speed at which
negotiations were moving only extended the suffering period of the black
community. The continued election of racist leaders only made patience an
unnecessary virtue.
King discredited the
law because the majority forces the minority to adhere to it while not
following it as required. He states that the laws are both unjust and
undemocratic to minorities rendering courtrooms and negotiationsuseless in the
struggle against segregation.
The answer for this is because of the recourses. There is a lot of food (seafood) and materials to be able to live life in and flourish in. Its actually pretty cool.