28. One cause of ww1 is the assassination of the archduke Fran Ferdinand.
The second cause is Austria-Hungary threatens war on Serbia
29. Trench warfare
30. Germany has to pay 33billon in reparations
Germany has to take full responsibility for the war
July 20, 1304 – July 18/19, 1374), commonly anglicized as Petrarch
The steps necessary for the transition between capitalism and communism are: abolish social classes, eliminating private property, give the means of production to the State, among others.
Capitalism is a political and economic social system that is based on private ownership of the means of production and individual and free capital separated from the State.
On the other hand, communism is a social, political, and economic system characterized by the state that owns the means of production and the non-existence of social classes.
Karl Marx was one of the leading sociologists to write about the transition from capitalism to communism, in his book Capital he described that the transition between these two systems required the following conditions:
- Establish a transitional system called socialism.
- Social classes should be abolished
- All private property was to be suspended.
- Control of the means of production should be given to the state.
- The differences between city and country had to be eliminated.
- The differences between manual and intellectual work had to be eliminated.
Learn more in: brainly.com/question/24086790
Yes,
oligarchy fits as a description of South African government under the system of apartheid. In the
political philosophy of Aristotle, "
aristocracy" is "rule by the excellent ones," and in certain eras of history or in some societies, one group or another has been portrayed as more "excellent" and thus more favorable for serving as governors. In Aristotle's political thought, an
"oligarchy" or "rule by a few" is a corruption of the idea of aristocracy. But Aristotle was biased, believing that by nature some persons are more excellent than others, that some are more suited by nature to be followers, not leaders. (Aristotle used such logic in defending the institution of slavery, for instance.) Today,
we might argue that any sort of "aristocracy" or elitism is always an oligarchy, an arbitrary system in which a few dominate over the many because of factors that can't rationally be defended.For another answer on a similar question, read more on Brainly.com -
brainly.com/question/9475348#readmore
