1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
SCORPION-xisa [38]
3 years ago
12

Explain the contrasts and similarities of immigration based on geography and pull and push factors before the Civil War and afte

r the Civil War.
History
1 answer:
NNADVOKAT [17]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Push factors may include conflict, drought, famine, or extreme religious activity. Poor economic activity and lack of job opportunities are also strong push factors for migration. Better economic opportunities, more jobs, and the promise of a better life often pull people into new locations.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
The education of plains indian children traditionally did not include
melomori [17]

Answer:

The education of plains indian children traditionally did not include: <u>books.</u>

Explanation:

The Indians or also knowns as native americans, that lived in the Great Plains did not always count with formal education, or educatioanl institutions. Misioners fisrt went there to try to teach them and give them an education, and bring them Christianity.

Before European misioners arrived, plains idians had their own way of passing or teaching about their history and values. So at the beginning they did not used books.

8 0
3 years ago
Please help I got stuck on this question ​
gregori [183]

Answer: C " If elected, I will lower taxes for smaller businesses."

Explanation: Under many previous Republican presidents they have introduced tax cuts for many businesses large and small, Including a somewhat recent tax cut under President Trump. Which the current president elect is suspected to pull back.

Tip: For future reference, note that the Republican Party does not believe in subsidized housing, or universal healthcare for all. However increasing spending on public education is a somewhat divided topic within the party.

3 0
3 years ago
How did the Magna Carta restrict the power of the king? What benefit did the nobles receive from restricting the king?
Rainbow [258]
The Magna Carta meant that 
1) the nobles (the barons) could not be imprisoned without a fair trial (restricting the power of the king to imprison)
2) the king could not raise new taxes without a council of baron's approval (restricting the power of the king to raise new taxes)
Explanation:
The Magna Carta was signed by King of England in June 1215 and was the primary document to inflict legal limits on the king's personal powers. Clause sixty one declared that a committee of twenty 5 barons may meet and overthrow the desire<span> of the king—a serious challenge to John's authority as ruling monarch.
</span>This has been the most<span> concern of the nobles </span>within the<span> years preceding the document </span>as a result of<span> taxes had been raised to fund a war against France. The nobility benefited </span>as a result of<span> the </span>royal charter outlined<span> individual rights and </span>emphasised<span> the role of laws in society. Clause </span>thirty-nine<span> states, </span>for instance<span>, </span>that folks ought to<span> be </span>corrected solely once<span> a ruling by their peers or by the sanctions of the law.</span>

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was one result of the War of 1812?
Gnom [1K]

The War of 1812 (1812–1815) was a conflict fought between the United States and the United Kingdom and their respective allies. Historians in Britain often see it as a minor theater of the Napoleonic Wars; however, in the United States and Canada, it is seen as a war in its own right.

Since the outbreak of war with Napoleonic France, Britain had enforced a naval blockade to choke off neutral trade to France, which the United States contested as illegal under international law. In order to man the blockade, Britain forcibly impressed American merchant sailors into the Royal Navy. The British were in turn outraged by the <span>Little Belt Affair</span>, which resulted in the deaths of 11 British sailors.[5][6] Moreover, British political support for a Native American buffer state, which conducted raids on American settlers on the frontier, hindered American expansion.[7] On June 18, 1812, President James Madison signed the American declaration of war into law.[8] The British government felt it had done everything in its power to try to avert the war and was therefore dismayed by the American declaration. Senior figures such as Lord Liverpool and Lord Castlereagh believed it to have been an opportunistic ploy by President Madison to annex Canada while Britain was fighting a war with France. The view was shared in much of New England, whose leaders bitterly disputed the numbers of US sailors the War Hawks claimed had been impressed by the British.

With the majority of its military deployed in Europe to fight Napoleon, the British adopted a defensive strategy, though the war's first engagement was an ill-fated assault on Sacket's Harbor, New York. American prosecution of the war effort suffered from its unpopularity, especially in New England, where it was derogatorily referred to as "Mr. Madison's War". American defeats at Detroit and Queenston thwarted attempts to seize Upper Canada, improving British morale.[9][10]American attempts to invade Montreal also failed. In 1813, the Americans won control of Lake Erie and shattered Tecumseh's Confederacy, securing a primary war goal.[11] At sea, the powerful Royal Navy blockaded the American coast, allowing them to strike American trade at will. In 1814, one of these raids burned the capital, Washington. The Americans subsequently repulsed British attempts to invade the north and mid-Atlantic states.

At home, the British faced mounting opposition to wartime taxation, and demands to reopen trade with America. With the abdication of Napoleon, the maintenance of the blockade of France, as well as the issue of the impressment of American sailors, were nullified. Peace negotiations began in August 1814, and the Treaty of Ghent was signed on December 24 later that year. However, news of the peace would not reach America for some time. Unaware that the treaty had been signed, British forces launched an invasion of Louisiana, which was decisively defeated in January 1815.[12] The battle was seen to have restored American honour after a mediocre war effort, and led to the collapse of anti-war sentiment. News of the treaty arrived shortly thereafter, halting military operations. The treaty was unanimously ratified by the United States on February 17, 1815, ending the war with no boundary changes.

8 0
3 years ago
HdbakalaiagsfcgsysyAiao
Darina [25.2K]

Answer:

b

Explanation:

i think hope it helps:)

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of these was a short-term result of the war industries board?
    14·2 answers
  • Can you put this in order please (look at the picture)
    10·2 answers
  • How did the railroads react to state governments legislation during the Gilded Age
    10·2 answers
  • The poem "howl" by allen ginsberg is a work that came out of the blank movement
    12·2 answers
  • during the time period just before the civil war, do you think southern politicians concentrated more on influencing the House o
    13·1 answer
  • Were there Mexican slaves?
    15·2 answers
  • PLEASE 35 POINTS
    7·2 answers
  • which individual might have been responsible for the sentiment mentioned in the picture during the 1920s?
    5·1 answer
  • Is sesh a British word???
    5·1 answer
  • Read the section "September 12 – The Battle of North Point."
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!