A newly discovered painting seems to be the work of one of two seventeenth-century artists, either the northern German Johannes
Drechen or the Frenchman Louis Birelle, who sometimes painted in the same style as Drechen. Analysis of the carved picture frame, which has been identified as the painting’s original seventeenth-century frame, showed that it is made of wood found widely in northern Germany at the time, but rare in the part of France where Birelle lived. This shows that the painting is most likely the work of Drechen. Which of the following is an assumption that the argument requires?
(A) The frame was made from wood local to the region where the picture was painted.
(B) Drechen is unlikely to have ever visited the home region of Birelle in France.
(C) Sometimes a painting so resembles others of its era that no expert is able to confidently decide who painted it.
(D) The painter of the picture chose the frame for the picture.
(E) The carving style of the picture frame is not typical of any specific region of Europe.
Answer: C. Sometimes a painting so resembles others of its era that no expert it's able to confidently decide who painted it.
Explanation: Because we can assume that the wood of the frame it's casually from Drechen's birth place, but it actually doesn't verifies that is his painting. With these kind of works it's really hard to find out the real author if we don't know what they have done before. Also, it depends where they found the painting, if someone ordinary owned it, we also can assume that he or she chose the frame. But wood frame it's not enough to know precisely the author of the painting.
