It could be argued that the interim revolutionary government in Russia in 1917 claimed to be democratic, but it did not have popular support because "<span>it was a compromise government made up of many parties with many views, pleasing everyone a little, but satisfying no one," since it's main objective was to "please the masses". </span>
No i personally don't think that canada should cut ties with the queen
Answer:
rule by the wealthy class
Answer:
Explanation:
Amendments may be proposed either by the Congress with a two-thirds vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate or by a convention of states called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures.[1] To become part of the Constitution, an amendment must be ratified by either—as determined by Congress—the legislatures of three-quarters of the states or state ratifying conventions in three-quarters of the states.[2] The vote of each state (to either ratify or reject a proposed amendment) carries equal weight, regardless of a state's population or length of time in the Union. Article V is silent regarding deadlines for the ratification of proposed amendments, but most amendments proposed since 1917 have included a deadline for ratification. Legal scholars generally agree that the amending process of Article V can itself be amended by the procedures laid out in Article V, but there is some disagreement over whether Article V is the exclusive means of amending the Constitution.
<span>C) it would ground into fine sediment by the glacier</span>