Newly arrived immigrants in some ways caused a lot of trouble to the economy. Especially for people who already lived in the area. One example of this is that immigrants created a lot of competition for jobs. Not to mention we didn't have t he money to fully support the ever growing amount of immigrants as well ( that why as many as 12 lived in 1 home).
Answer:
Chinese homes differed, like anything else, depending on one's social class and how much money one had. Peasants lived in huts while merchants and other middle-class people lived in houses made of wood, which were built around a rectangular courtyard where a garden would be planted.
Explanation:
In Australia, the most populated region by natives was places like the outback and what is nowadays known as Alice springs. The New Zealand had a more or less equally spread population because of it's much smaller sides, but there was a bias towards the North where there were more people than in the South of the island.
Laissez-faire or free enterprise system is the principle wherein the government has little or minimal interference in the nation's economy.
This principle allowed more people to open, specialize, and industrialize their business efforts. This practice boosted the economy making more profit not only for the business people but for the nation as a whole.
It also benefited consumers because they were able to have more choices in terms of basic and luxury products.
Answer:Federalist Ten is a document written by James Madison in the late 1700s. In his paper, Madison is making two arguments regarding the main differences between a democracy and a republic. He believes that a republic is superior to a democracy because a democracy cannot prevent the violence in factions.
Explanation:
Written by James Madison, this essay defended the form of republican government proposed by the Constitution. Critics of the Constitution argued that the proposed federal government was too large and would be unresponsive to the people. In response, Madison explored majority rule v. minority rights in this essay.
