Answer:
In preparing a statement of cash flows under the indirect method, an increase in accounts payable would be reported or included as a(n):
source of cash.
Explanation:
Accounts payable are liabilities owed to suppliers for goods or services. They are listed on the balance sheet under current liabilities and on the cash flow statement under operating activities. When preparing the statement of cash flows, an increase in accounts payable is regarded as a source of cash while a decrease is regarded as a use of cash.
The option that is not correct with respect to using bcc for recipients of a message is this:
- It should be the default for all correspondence.
<h3 /><h3>What is the Blind Carbon Copy?</h3>
Blind carbon copy is a way of preventing the recipients of a bulk message from viewing the other addressees. While it is a very good privacy option, it is not expected to be the default for all correspondence.
Sometimes, the addressees might have to view their counterparts so BCC is enabled in such cases.
Learn more about the Blind Carbon Copy here:
brainly.com/question/3594902
#SPJ11
Answer:
Cash provided by operations is $250
Explanation:
<em>If a company has net income of 180, depreciation of 50, change in asset and liability accounts of $20, then cash provided by the operation is?</em>
<em />
Cash flows from operating activities
Net Income $180
<em>Adjustments to reconcile net loss </em>
<em>to net cash flow from operating activities</em>
Add: Depreciation $50
Add: Change in net current assets <u>$20</u> <u>$70 </u>
Cash provided by operations <u>$250</u>
Answer:
Arithmetic = 3%
Geometric = 2.37%
Explanation:
The arithmetic average of 'n' returns is given by:
For five returns of 5% ,21%, -12%, 7%, and -6%:
The geometric average of 'n' returns is given by:
![G=\sqrt[n]{(1+r_1)*(1+r_2)*...*(1+r_n)}-1](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=G%3D%5Csqrt%5Bn%5D%7B%281%2Br_1%29%2A%281%2Br_2%29%2A...%2A%281%2Br_n%29%7D-1)
For five returns of 5% ,21%, -12%, 7%, and -6%:
![G=\sqrt[5]{(1+0.05)*(1+0.21)*(1-0.12)*(1+0.07)*(1-0.06)}-1\\G=0.0237=2.37\%](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=G%3D%5Csqrt%5B5%5D%7B%281%2B0.05%29%2A%281%2B0.21%29%2A%281-0.12%29%2A%281%2B0.07%29%2A%281-0.06%29%7D-1%5C%5CG%3D0.0237%3D2.37%5C%25)
Many activists and watchdogs argue that Google has not always done enough to promote or even protect human rights around the world. This is usually the result of efforts by Google to market its search engine in nations like China, where the state has an interest in maintaining censorship of search results. The project, known as Dragonfly, was recently abandoned by Google.
In recent years, Google was among the companies that faced criticism for marketing an app that allowed men in Saudi Arabia to track the locations of their wives by using their cell phones. This was seen as an affront to women's rights, and the company withdrew the product after criticism from the media and shareholders. Google's interest in artificial intelligence has also led to criticism about its commitment to ethical practices and to human rights.
At the same time, there is no doubt that Google has expanded people's access to information and to many other online services around the world. It has made several global public statements against censorship. Its most vocal critics, indeed, have pointed to its previous stands for free access to information in pointing out the hypocrisy of Dragonfly and other ventures.
