All categories

3 years ago

A court ruling against the wrongful dismissal of employees is a development in the _____ component of the general environment.

1 answer:

7 0

The correct answer is "C".
A court ruling against the wrongful dismissal of employees is a development in the "political/legal" component of the general environment. The political/legal component contain the legislation, regulations, and decisions of the court which govern and regulate the behavior of business.

You might be interested in

When reagan took office, he brought with him a new economic philosophy. with the guidance of his economic advisors, he tried to

Natali [406]

The nation’s deficit rose greatly as inflation and unemployment fell was an economic concern that was related to the achievement described in the passage.

<h3>What were the economic concerns in the passage? </h3>

The passage explains that with the fall in tax revenue of the government and higher spending on employment programs, the federal deficit started to rise.

However, after some years, it could be seen that many businesses gained growth from government spending and created jobs with decreasing inflation rates.

Learn more about economic concerns here:

brainly.com/question/10203871

4 0

2 years ago

Which of the following is an advantage of the corporate form of business when compared to sole proprietorships and partnerships?

Rudiy27

Answer:

D. Limited Partnership

Explanation:

Sole proprietorship is business owned , run & managed by single owner. Partnership is a business owned , run & managed by small group of people - deciding to share its profits .

Entrepreneurs in these have Unlimited Liability on personal assets, in case business assets are insufficient to settle business liabilities .

Corporation is a separate legal entity, distinct from its huge group of owners , guided by a board of directors. In case of any claim / sue case : it is against corporate entity & not the people, so they don't have any unlimited liability risk on personal assets to fulfil company's claims .

5 0

3 years ago

The Reingold Hat Company uses the allowance method to account for bad debts. During 2018, the company recorded $800,000 in credi

olasank [31]

Answer:

$24,000

Explanation:

Since in the question it is given that the 3% of credit sales is considered to be a bad debt expense

where,

Credit sales is $800,000

And, the estimated percentage is 3%

So by considering this above information, the amount debited to bad debt expense is

= $800,000 × 3%

= $24,000

All the other information i.e to be given is not relevant. Hence, ignored it

4 0

3 years ago

An asset falling under the MACRS five-year class was purchased three years ago for $200,000 (its original depreciation basis). C

Nitella [24]

Answer:

(a) The cash flows is $59,040.

(b) The cash flows is $71,040.

Explanation:

From the Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System (MACRS) Tables, the depreciation rates for the first 3 years for an asset falling under the MACRS five-year class are 20%, 32% and 19.2%. Therefore, we have:

Accumulated depreciation rate = 20% + 32% + 19.2% = 71.20%

Accumulated depreciation = Cost of the asset * Accumulated depreciation rate = $200,000 * 71.20% = $142,400

Net book value of the asset = Cost of the asset - Accumulated depreciation = $200,000 - $142,400 = $57,600

We can now proceed as follows:

(a) Calculate the cash flows if the asset is sold now at $60,000

Capital gains = Sales proceeds - Net book value = $60,000 - $57,600 = $2,400

Capital gains tax = Capital gains * Tax rate = $2,400 * 40% = $960

Net sales proceeds = Sales proceeds - Capital gains tax = $60,000 - $960 = $59,040

Therefore, the cash flows is $59,040 net sales proceeds.

(b) Calculate the cash flows if the asset is sold now at $80,000

Capital gains = Sales proceeds - Net book value = $80,000 - $57,600 = $22,400

Capital gains tax = Capital gains * Tax rate = $22,400 * 40% = $8,960

Net sales proceeds = Sales proceeds - Capital gains tax = $80,000 - $8,960 = $71,040

Therefore, the cash flows is $71,040 net sales proceeds.

3 0

3 years ago

The table below presents the average and marginal cost of producing cheeseburgers per hour at a roadside diner.

Butoxors [25]

Answer:

a. At a quantity of 40 cheeseburgers per hour, the average total cost of production is falling and the marginal cost of cheeseburger production is rising.

b. At a quantity of 60 cheeseburgers per hour, the average variable cost of production is rising and the average total cost of cheeseburger production is at a minimum.

Explanation:

a. At a quantity of 40 cheeseburgers per hour, the average total cost of production is falling and the marginal cost of cheeseburger production is rising.

From the table in the question, it can be observed that the average total cost of production at a quantity of 30 cheeseburgers per hour is higher than the average total cost of production at a quantity of 40 cheeseburgers per hour, while the average total cost of production at a quantity of 50 cheeseburgers per hour is lower than the average total cost of production at a quantity of 40 cheeseburgers per hour. This implies that at a quantity of 40 cheeseburgers per hour, the average total cost of production is falling.

Also from the table in the question, it can be observed that the marginal cost of production at a quantity of 30 cheeseburgers per hour is lower than the marginal cost of production at a quantity of 40 cheeseburgers per hour, while the marginal cost of production at a quantity of 50 cheeseburgers per hour is higher than the marginal cost of production at a quantity of 40 cheeseburgers per hour. This implies that at a quantity of 40 cheeseburgers per hour, the marginal cost of production is rising.

b. At a quantity of 60 cheeseburgers per hour, the average variable cost of production is rising and the average total cost of cheeseburger production is at a minimum.

From the table in the question, it can be observed that the average variable cost of production at a quantity of 50 cheeseburgers per hour is lower than the average variable cost of production at a quantity of 60 cheeseburgers per hour, while the average variable cost of production at a quantity of 70 cheeseburgers per hour is higher than the average variable cost of production at a quantity of 60 cheeseburgers per hour. This implies that at a quantity of 60 cheeseburgers per hour, the average variable cost of production is rising.

Also from the table in the question, it can be observed that the average total cost of cheeseburger production at quantities of 50 and 60 cheeseburgers per hour are equal and the lowest on the table, this implies that the average total cost of cheeseburger production is at a minimum at a quantity of 60 cheeseburgers per hour.

7 0

3 years ago