McCarthyism is nothing more than a witch hunt. A lot of finger pointing and not a lot of proof. Both parties (Democrat & Republican) in the United States use this in todays world. Ill give examples of both and follow up with how it can be beneficial to each party.
Democrats: Accuse other politicians of being "racist" or "bigoted" just from political ideas and from certain members of the base. While it is not fact or true that Republicans are by policy racist, it is a word that is hated by people and has a negative connotation to it, forcing some to keep distance from said person
Republicans: Accuse other politicians of being "muslin lovers" or "muslins" themselves. We saw this for the entire Obama presidency. Congress and some Republican supporters would use the word "muslin" to describe the president in order to give a negative connotation towards Obama. This has some strong effectiveness due to the recent events (September 11th, 2001).
Both parties are trying to stick a negative idea/precedent/description about the opposition in order to sway votes. This tactic is very effective because not only will you sway votes, theres little repercussion in doing so because the people who disagree with you are not going to be swayed, but that voter in the middle who cares about one issue over the other (in this case racism over fear of muslims or vice versa fear of muslims over racism).
Either someone is intelligent enough to know the rhetoric between the two parties and votes by policy (unaffected / no positive or negative response), they don't care about either issue (unaffected / no positive or negative response), or someone is strongly in favor of one or the other (strong positive or negative response).
While there are some attempts that have been made and can be made that would be so egregious that most people have a negative response, but that rarely happens and would be deemed political suicide.
Hope this helps.
Answer:
helping children acquire those virtues or moral habits that will help them individually live good lives and at the same time become productive, contributing members of their communities.
Explanation:
Answer: The effect of the point of view is A) the reader gets direct advice on the process. Moreover, the author's purpose is A) to explain how to get around meat restrictions. Finally, the point of view that the author uses in this passage is B) Second person.
Explanation: The point of view that the author uses in this passage is second person as<u> he is directly addressing the reader.</u> What indicates this is the <u>use of the second person pronoun "you"</u>. As a result,<u> the reader receives direct advice from the writer</u>, which is mainly expressed in the first sentence ("If you are really determined to eat meat all week, it is possible to buy a license to do so"). Therefore, the advice is the effect of the second person point of view. As regards the author's purpose, <u>he intends to explain the reader how to eat meat despite the restrictions</u> set on the consumption of this type of food. This is also expressed in the first sentence of the passage.
Answer:
third one
Explanation:
“ It causes you to evaluate who you are, what you want to be, who you want to be, and helps you recognize the flaws and pitfalls in modern thinking. Nowadays many writers are afraid of hurting the reader's feelings or alienating people by writing messages that the reader disagrees with and that society may frown upon.”
