<span>There is no question here, at all. It is simply a statement of the actions of one person in a laboratory with no mention of what is being asked. I am not sure how to approach this.</span>
Numerous nations today claim to be people oriented and democratic based systems, however in the event that the subjects are not associated with government and legislative issues, they are just in name as it were. To some a larger extent the United States have always proven to be an exemplary country with the few points listed below:
The right to speak freely: If it were in other countries CNN would not have the kind of freedom to even show events as they relate to the white house and senate ,the press, and religion. US permits total opportunity for the press to be free and fair for and also for people to air their grievances , however majority rules systems don't intensely edit daily papers and open articulation of feelings.
Lion's share control with minority rights. In popular governments, individuals ordinarily acknowledge choices made by the greater part of voters in a free decision. Nonetheless, vote based systems attempt to dodge the "oppression of the dominant part" by giving approaches to minorities different sorts to have their voices heard also. USA shows a leadership in this regard
Changed individual foundations of political pioneers. Vote based systems more often than not leave space for a wide range of sorts of subjects to go after administration positions. As it were, presidents and officials don't all originate from a couple of tip top families, a similar piece of the nation, or a similar social class. USA sets the stage for a totally transparency with regards to this
Free & fair elections. The nearness of decisions alone isn't sufficient to call a nation a majority rule government. The decisions must be reasonable and aggressive, and the administration or political pioneers can't control the outcomes. Voters must have genuine options among applicants who keep running for open office and from time to time its always been fight free.
Judiciary rule book . Majority rules systems are not controlled by the impulses of a pioneer, but rather they are represented by laws that apply to pioneers and residents similarly. Everything in the USA is according to law
How much an administration satisfies these criteria is how much it can be viewed as fair. USA have shown all the qualities to be called a truly democratic society , even if there are flaws, it's still leading when compared to how other countries are being run and leaders elected. Rule of fairness made President Donald trump to become the president because if he was judged out of the rule book, he would not have been given the chance in the first place to run.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The three possible research questions for a Historian that wants to know more about personal and cultural expression during the Silk Road period would be the following.
1.- How much did the impact of the Silk Road could Change if other tribes could have opposed freeing the transit of merchants in India or North Africa?
2.- What could have been the consequences if Muslims had hoarded trade routes and charge for the transit of these routes?
3.- How is it that scholars do not value the exchange of ideas and innovations during the times of the Silk Road as they value the interchange of goods?
In ancient times, the Silk Road was a series of roads that connected China, Asia, North Africa, India, and Europe. These roads mainly served as trade routes that served to transport people and goods. For many years, nations used these roads and sea routes to trade species, animals, precious metals, crops, and also to spread diseases.
<span>Tensions built between Spain and England over the course of Elizabeth I's reign. </span>
<span>Religious differences: Philip II of Spain wanted England, along with all Protestant countries, to return to the Roman Catholic faith </span>
Answer:
3 Facts:
1.he Americans would win the Revolutionary War!
2.The revelutionary war was fought on January 17, 1781,
3.between American Colonial forces under Brigadier General Daniel Morgan and British forces under Lieutenant Colonel Sir Banastre Tarleton, as part of the campaign in the Carolinas.
summary: The Battle of Cowpens was an engagement during the American Revolutionary War fought on January 17, 1781, between American Colonial forces under Brigadier General Daniel Morgan and British forces under Lieutenant Colonel Sir Banastre Tarleton, as part of the campaign in the Carolinas (North and South).
Explanation:
Please mark brainliest!
