Answer: The pundit is using a NATIONAL DEFENSE ARGUMENT to justify the trade restriction.
Explanation: National defense argument is when someone is using the security of the nation to defend his argument, to be very important as the security of the nation is very important.
This type of argument always tends to use the fallacy of red herring to convince his audience about his argument. The argument sounds to be important as it used red herring to relate it's point to the security of the nation during wartime.
The pundit politician has used the fallacy of red herring to relate it's reason of increment in the tariff of semiconductor importation, to the security of the nation during war times. Therefore this is a national security argument.
The scenario above exemplifies object permanence. It is likely that Madeline has exhibit this as she believes the cookie is still there even if she does not know where it is. An object permanence explains that a person would believe that a certain thing or object exist without having the assurance of its existence. It could be seen above as Madeline thinks that the cookie is still there even if it is hidden and not seen from her sight.
Answer:
Direct examination
Explanation:
Direct examination and cross-examination are a technique that is used by health mental experts. It is an examination of a patient. The psychologist, psychiatrist, and doctors observe the patient and help the patient in that context. All expert has a specific quality through which they treat their patients. In the direct examination, patient-doctor rapport establishes and they can observe their patient and listen to their thought carefully.
Anna Sues Whitney. Here Anna's doctor has to be a witness in the witnessed stand. This is called direct examination.
Answer:
C - habituation.
Explanation:
As the exercise explains, when an infant is repeatedly faced or exposed to a visual stimulus, their interest wanes and look away or refuse looking sooner. This decrease in the infant's responsiveness is called habituation. So, in other words, this is a process in which a response decreases as it's exposure is longer or becomes more repeated. There are times where the response is to completely ignore it. To add another example, it could happen that we have or work with a noisy air conditioner. At first we might hear it all the time but, after some time, we would hear it less often, and then less frequently, and then we might even ignore it's complete existance.
