Answer:
1) Charlotte lived technology and science. She was also quite adventurous.
2) It says Charlotte was thrilled to try the operating two model robot arms and was fascinated by it.
3)
· (You gave it)
· Who were her team members; were her friends in that shuttle in her dream?
4) Did you enjoy the task? (She stated that after finishing it, she knew for a fact she was going to be an astronaut when she grew up. She must have really enjoyed it.)
5) (In Picture :D)
6) In my opinion, Uncle Ty is more interesting because he has already designed rockets and works at NASA, which is the biggest space center in the world!
-------------------------------------------------------
<h3>
Hope this Helps!</h3>
:)
The answer to the given question above would be SUBJUNCTIVE. The answer for this is option B. Based on the given sentence above, given the sentence's underlined verb, the mood for this is subjunctive. Hope this answers your question. Have a great day ahead!
Steinback used parallelism in Grapes of Wrath to emphasise the fact that people were not happy because of the new migrants in their neighbourhood.
<u>EXPLANATION: </u>
- Parallelism or Parallel construction means to create a balance between two similar words or phrases.
- It adds effect and force in writing and readers like to read.
- Steinback used parallelism in 'Grapes of Wrath' to emphasise on the fact that people did not like the new migrants entering their neighbourhood.
- He highlighted the contrast between the two ideas in the novel with the use of parallelism.
- It teaches that though there are hardships in one's life, love and strength can help us stay strong.
Assuming that the italicized word is "dog," an adjective to best describe it would be A.
You can find the answer according to context clues. We know that the dog went through a "small hole," which surprises the speaker. Since the speaker doesn't understand how his or her dog could have fit through the hole, we can infer that the dog is the opposite of small, which is big. Another word for big is gigantic.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
You did not include the name of the book, story, the name of the writer, or any text as a reference. Without that information, we can only comment on the following general terms.
If the theme of your text is the truth about life, what you should do is to find the two or three elements of the text that support that affirmation and see how the author supports the statements. This means that you have to look for the arguments established so you can use and correctly apply the REST strategy.
For instance, if the theme you draw from these literary elements is that life has its ups and downs, you need to support your answer by providing the arguments of examples of the text that you did not include here.
The REST strategy stands for:
Restate the affirmation or the question you are about to comment.
Explain the argument of your answer.
Support with proper details, examples, and references.
Tada. Provide a good conclusion that astonishes your readers.
