It is inductive reasoning: generalizing from a small sample to a bigger population. Deductive reasoning would be, if the sentences were in the other order. It's also not faulty, as it's not contradictory.
The available options are:
A. There should be higher taxes and more public services.
B. State and federal elections should be held more frequently.
C. Taxes should be lowered even if this means fewer public services.
D. The U.S. House of Representatives is more important than the Senate.
Answer:
Taxes should be lowered even if this means fewer public services.
Explanation:
Republicans generally hold the opinion or notion that tax should be lower. In other words, Republicans support various tax cuts, including the abolition of the death tax.
This was evident during the administration of President Bush with his Bush Tax Cut.
For examples The Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 and The Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003
Answer:
North Carolina and South Carolina.
Answer:
kansas
Explanation:
"self-determination was called popular sovereignty.
In Kansas, people on all sides of this controversial issue flooded the territory, trying to influence the vote in their favor.
Rival territorial governments, election fraud, and squabbles over land claims all contributed to the violence of this era"
nps
1 and 4 are the best choices since The barbarian attacks killed many romans and the Huns sacked hundreds of cities in the Roman Empire and caused chaos. I also believe 4 is another reason for the decline, since the religion started about 400 years before the fall of the empire and sparked many different believes and divided the Empire through religion.
