The answer is D the indirect strategy does not allow a set order of ideas
Answer:
Instructions are below.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Total fixed costs= 300,000
Total costs= $450,000
Units= 120,000
A) Unitary variable cost= 150,000/120,000= $1.25
B) Units= 75,000
<u>The fixed costs remain constant no matter how many units are made (between relevant ranges).</u>
Total fixed costs= $300,000
C) UNits= 160,000
Total variable costs= 1.25*160,000= $200,000
D) Units= 180,000
Total fixed costs= 300,000
Total variable costs= 1.25*180,0000= 225,000
Total costs= $525,000
Find the charge of A AND B to go to C and then you have to scream rlly loud okay! and then you have to jump up and down for 3x • 4x = 9p squared okay
Agreed! This is so true tho!
Answer:
2) assumption not made
Explanation:
The original statement does not include any assumption about what the companies are doing about this issue, it just proposes an idea of fair compensation.
maybe whoever wrote this statement believes that very few companies or none at all actually compensate homeowners for a reduction in the market value of their properties, but it doesn't state it. It is also possible that the statement assumes that companies are paying some compensations or were paying some compensations but are not willing to continue to do it since no legislation forces them to do so. The author's position is vague and not clear with respect to what the companies are currently doing.
