Answer:
The correct answer is Formal Benchmarking.
Explanation:
The English term "benchmark" comes from the words "bench" (bench, table) and "mark" (brand, sign). In the original meaning of English, the word compound could however be translated as a measure of quality. In other words, benchmarking is a way to determine how well a company performs, compared to others.
In order to be more competitive at present, it is necessary to use benchmarking since it provides strategies that allow identifying the best keys to the company's success, so that by implementing them the organization can be a leading and competitive company in a changing market and global in which business organizations currently have to see each other.
The majority of authors relate benchmarking with competitiveness and business improvement, being "the company" its natural scope. However, the potential benefits of its use make it considered in other areas, such as "public organizations", and at other levels, "sectoral" and "environment" (regional, national and international). This complicates the definition of the concept, since it is a tool that has multiple application possibilities, pursues different objectives in each case, and uses its own methodology in each area.
The approach that Mr. McKay is using in the setting is the
problem based learning. The PBL or the Problem based learning is defined as a
student centered pedagogy by which students are likely to learn a particular subject
based from the experience of having to solve open ended problem found in a
material that triggers it.
Answer:
Results are below.
Explanation:
<u>To calculate the break-even point in units, we need to use the following formula:</u>
Break-even point (units)= Total fixed costs / Weighted average contribution margin
Weighted average contribution margin= 0.2*33 + 0.5*22 + 0.3*41
Weighted average contribution margin= $29.9
Break-even point (units)= 4,544,800 / 29.9
Break-even point (units)= 152,000 units
<u>Now, for each product:</u>
<u></u>
Lawnmowers= 0.2*152,000=30,400
Weed-trimmers= 0.5*152,000= 76,000
Chainsaws= 0.3*152,000= 45,600
Answer:
The long term capital gain= $30000-$25000
The long term capital gain= $5000
The basis in stock will be zero after the distribution.
Explanation:
Step 1 of 3
Tax treatment of amount distributed to shareholders:
The amount received as distribution to a shareholder under S Corporation is equal to the cash and fair market value of property distributed. The distribution is considered as tax-free to the limit that it does not exceed shareholder’s basis in the company’s stock. Any amount received in excess of basis will be treated as capital gain.
Step 2 of 3
However, taxation depends whether S Corporation has ever been a C Company or it posses’ accumulated earnings and profits. If it was never a C Corporation or doesn’t holds AEP then distribution equals to basis of share in S Corporation is a tax free gain for shareholder. Gain over and above basis is taxed as capital gains.
Step 3 of 3
In the given problem, C is a shareholder in S Corporation. He receives $30,000 as cash distribution. His basis in stock is $25,000. The distribution up to basis of stock is tax free distribution and above that is charged to capital gains. It is as follows-
Thus, capital gain of is taxable in hands of C. His basis in S Corporation will reduced to zero as entire distribution is over and above basis of his stock.
Answer:
3. Supply of flour to increase.
Explanation:
The situation above is showing a<em> direct proportional relationship</em> between the "wheat," as a main ingredient of flour, and the flour itself.
If the price of wheat <em>decreases</em>, <u>suppliers will be interested in buying more of it in order to produce more quantities of flour at a </u><em><u>lower cost </u></em>because it will more likely lead to a<em><u> higher profit</u></em>. This will, therefore, increase the supply of flour in the market.