1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mademuasel [1]
3 years ago
6

Which of the following is a valid defense to a defamation claim?

Law
2 answers:
adoni [48]3 years ago
6 0
<h2>Answer:</h2>

<u>d. All of the answers</u> are valid defense to defamation claim.

<h2>Explanation:</h2>

Defamation is a false accusation of one person to damage the reputation of other person or party. It is the false statement of actual fact. A person or party making a defamatory statement can be a privileged or a normal person.

If he/she is qualified and privileged, he/she should prove that the defamation is intentional or ill-will. In either case, one must prove the defamation in a legal way. The major defenses to a defamation claim are declaring the truth, qualified or absolute privilege, accept that it was a statement of opinion, written consent about the defamation, and defamation is made against someone else or third party.

Sedbober [7]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: D

Explanation:

The answer is D. all of these answers.

You might be interested in
TRUE or False - You can charge someone with both assault and battery - Civilly and Criminally. Again True or False???
loris [4]

Answer:

The answer is yes. Some actions involve both criminal and civil matters. For example, assault can be both a civil matter and a criminal matter. ... For example, a person who has intentionally killed another can be charged in criminal court with homicide and can also be sued civilly for wrongful death.

Explanation: (true)

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Ellen is a probation officer who has submitted a report to the judge that will be used in the sentencing decision of a defendant
katovenus [111]

Answer:

ellen is stupid dumb retarted and ugly

Explanation:

this is because your mom said so

stupid

7 0
4 years ago
Why did the federal government eliminate parole?
Mama L [17]

Congress eliminated parole for  defendants found guilty of crimes committed after November 1, 1987. Congress eliminated parole in part because of a fear of unpredictable outcomes.

5 0
3 years ago
WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
Paraphin [41]
The answer would be (B. 10th Amendment.)
4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which factor would Anti-Federalists most strongly support?
Maslowich

Answer:

Anti-federalists insisted that a Bill of Rights must be included in the Constitution to protect individual's rights against a powerful central government.The anti-Federalists would most likely agree with the argument that government should tax only to raise money for its essential functions, which is from the Republican position on the economy.

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Describe 3 amendments that increased suffrage in the U.S.
    6·2 answers
  • 2. Relatively few drivers are touched by the
    14·1 answer
  • John Redmond was not paid for trim carpentry work that he did for Brenda Knighton in her home. Ms. Knighton does not dispute tha
    8·1 answer
  • A form of government in which the people elect (through voting) representatives to make policies and laws for
    8·1 answer
  • A decision that a jury has to make, that would resolve the
    14·1 answer
  • If you are married and your partner commits a crime, what is your responsibility as a witness in the trial of your husband or wi
    10·1 answer
  • What are the rights of a suspect after an arrest or detention?
    8·2 answers
  • In a criminal trial, the investigators were Informed that the judge will not allow the testimony to be entered into evidence. Wh
    11·1 answer
  • Oh, so your a lawyer? name every law
    8·1 answer
  • Natural citizens ___.
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!