1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
professor190 [17]
3 years ago
13

The values for three sets of data are shown below. Data Data Set Values 1 42, 48, 50, 88, 49 2 63, 29, 35, 28, 30 3 2, 5, 3, 8 W

ithout calculating any statistics, Anna knows that data set 3 would have the least mean absolute deviation among the three sets. Which statement explains how she knows?
Mathematics
2 answers:
nataly862011 [7]3 years ago
8 0
<h2>Answer:</h2>

data set 3 would have the least mean absolute deviation among the three sets since there is less spread of the data and the data values in set-3 lie close to the mean.

<h2>Step-by-step explanation:</h2>

The mean absolute deviation is a  measure of spread of the data.

  • If the data values in the given data set are widely spread then we obtain a higher mean absolute deviation.
  • if the data values of a given data set are close to each other i.e there is a less spread of the data and hence the mean absolute deviation will be low as the data values will lie close to the mean.

We are given three data set as:

set- 1             42, 48, 50, 88, 49

set- 2             63, 29, 35, 28, 30

set- 3                2, 5, 3, 8

Hence, we could observe that the data values in set 1 and set 2 are widely spread.

In set-1 the data value 88 is  much higher value as compared to other data values.

Similarly in set-2 the data value 63 is again a much higher value as compared to other data values.

Whereas in set-3 the data values are all closely related and there is not much spread in the data.

Mazyrski [523]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

data set 3 would have the least mean absolute deviation among the three sets since there is less spread of the data and the data values in set-3 lie close to the mean.

You might be interested in
Triangle FGH is dilated agout the origin make triangle F'G'H' as shown here. Which rule represents the dilation applied to trian
elena-s [515]

Answer:

Answer is J

Step-by-step explanation:

Count the height of each traingle and divide both of them, it's also going to be greater than 1X since the dialted image is larger than the original

7 0
3 years ago
Give f(x) = X2 + 3x-1, find b) f(-1)​
nikklg [1K]

Answer:

-3

Step-by-step explanation:

f(x)= x²+3x-1

f(-1)= (-1)²+3(-1)-1

= 1-3-1

= -2-1

= -3

7 0
3 years ago
What is the order from least to greatest?
kenny6666 [7]

Answer:

5/4, 1.3, 1 8/25

Step-by-step explanation:

5/4 is equal to 1 1/4, which is 1.25

1.3 is still 1.3

1 8/25 is equal to 1.32, which is sliglightly greater than 1.3

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The pH scale measures how acidic or basic a substance is. Lemon juice is said to have a pH of less than 4 and greater than 1.5.
aev [14]

Answer:

this is an example

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Given the piecewise function above evaluate the following statements. (write "DNE" if the limit does not exist)
Sveta_85 [38]

By analyzing the graph of the function, we will see that:

  • a) DNE
  • b) 3
  • c) -1
  • d) 3
  • e) DNE
  • f) 2

<h3>How to get the limits of the given function?</h3>

Remember that when we take a limit to a given value, we approach to that value by two directions (from above and below) and see at which value the function approaches.

So, for the first limit we have:

x ⇒ -2

As you can see, if we approach from below the function tends to 4, while if we approach from above, the function tends to -1, which means that this limit does not exist. DNE.

x ⇒ 0

The function is continuous here, so the limit is equal to the value of the function in that point, which is 3

x ⇒ 2

If we approach from above and below we get the same number, which is -1, so the limit is equal to -1.

x = 2

Now we are directly evaluating the function in x = 2, and we can see that there is a jump such that f(2) = 3

x ⇒ 4

Here we have two asymptotes, one goes to infinity and the other to negative infinity, so this limit does not exist.

x ⇒ ∞

So we can't see how the function behaves for large values of x, so there is no way to answer this exactly.

If we suppose that the function does not change, we can see that we have a rational function in the right side of the image, so we can expect that as x tends to infinity, the function will tend asymptotically to 2.

Why 2?

Because the denominator becomes zero when x = 4, then when x = 5 the denominator is equal to 1.

At that point, the function is equal to 3, so the function is something like:

y = 1/(x - 4) + 2

If you want to learn more about limits, you can read:

brainly.com/question/5313449

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which expression shows the length, BC, of the base of the stand?
    8·1 answer
  • What do you think could reduce the difference? That's the question...Please help me I've been stuck here for hours!
    9·1 answer
  • Rewrite the expression −7/8 − 2 1/4 ​as the sum of two numbers.
    14·1 answer
  • What is the following simplified product? Assume x greater-than-or-equal-to 0
    8·2 answers
  • Let A = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5} and B = {2, 4}. What is A ∩ B?
    14·2 answers
  • What is 13/14+57/8 equally<br> In fraction form
    10·1 answer
  • Add 5 + (-8).<br><br> 13<br> -13<br> 3<br> -3
    15·2 answers
  • Find the equivalent equation that does not contain fractions 2/3 x 7=1/2
    7·1 answer
  • WILL MARK BRAINLIEST IF CORRECT!
    14·1 answer
  • Solve for x. Please look at the picture and answer it. Thank you.
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!