Answer: The article read by Yuki is more likely to have been peer-reviewed because this article is part of a Journal Medicine and peer-review is mandatory in most Academic journals before publication.
Explanation:
Peer-review implies academic works such as research papers or articles are verified by peers of the author. For example, a medical article is evaluated by other experts in the same field with similar knowledge and competences. This process is essential to guarantee the information is accurate and reliable. Moreover, peer-review is used mainly in academic journals or academic papers. Indeed, most academic journals require new articles or papers to be peer-review before these are published in the journal.
In this context, it is likely the article red by Yuki has been peer-reviewed because this is part of a Medicine journal and it is a general standard for articles in journals to be reviewed. Also, this is not a requirement for articles published in regular magazines such as Tasty Food magazine.
The correct answer of the given question above would be option C. The best option that defines sustainable fishing practices is that, harvesting practices that do not reduce the potential for future harvests. Sustainable fishing guarantees that the population of the ocean and freshwater wildlife is still present over time. Hope this answer helps.
Should there be answer choices that go with this question?
If not here is an answer that may help.
This is how the cycling between photosynthesis<span> and cellular respiration occurs: </span>in photosynthesis<span>, carbon dioxide and water, </span>in<span> the presence of light energy, are converted to make glucose and oxygen.</span>
