Answer:
I think for starters its pretty good.
Explanation:
If you write more, I would love to read if you add on to this. Would love to see where thia goes!
Answer:
"Did you do the homework?" I asked him.
Explanation:
<span>The men sent by Odysseus to investigate the land they had landed upon became forgetful after eating Lotus plants.</span>
C.) Both inform the reader that Faryad and Liaqat were not given the chance to tell their version of events at the police station.
In the frames, both Faryad and Liaqat put their fingerprint on a piece of paper when they are at the police station. However, neither of them are given a chance to tell their story. In Faryad's case, "the police write down what they claim has happened". The testimony in the report is not Faryad's. In Liaqat's case, after he put his fingerprint on the paper, he was told to leave and not given any interview.
Option D is incorrect because the reader is not the one responsible for investigating what Faryad and Liaqat were prevented from saying. It does make the reader curious and interested, but the reader can't do the investigation. Option B is wrong because there is no miscommunication. Option A is wrong because there is no proof or even mention of a death in either the frames or the excerpt.
The main clause is clams and the subordinate clause is fresh used as an adjective.
