Answer: I think it is The number of house seats per state.
you can always google it.
Explanation:
I believe the answer is: <span>whose name you have heard most often.
We would automatically perceive the people which name we heard most often are the most popular people compared to other candidates.
A lot of us would automatically attribute those popularity with positive things and increase our likelihood to choose them.</span>
I think the summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case
Summary judgement is entered by the court if the plaintiff does not have sufficient evidence that the defendants actually do what they're accused of before moving to trial.
On this case, There is a strong proof that peoples restaurant is aware of Hoag's alcoholism : <u>intoxicated</u>
This mean that sabo can proof that the bar know hoag is an alcoholic and had served enough amount to hoag to get him intoxicated.
This mean that Sabo's case is strong enough to be brought to the trial. keep in mind that Sabo is unlikely to win the trial since the restaurant does not directly involved in the accident. but we can definitely say that summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case.
The product of exposure, life experiences and learning of an individual
Social cognition is a sub-topic of social psychology that concentrates on how people process, repository, and implement information about different people and social conditions. It directs on the part that cognitive processes operating in our social synergies. The process of our thinking regarding others presents a significant role in how to recall, think, and communicate with the environment around us.
