Answer:
unconditioned Stimulus
Explanation:
Pavlov's classical conditioning experiments result in getting a reaction from the unconditioned stimulus which was earlier triggered by a neutral stimulus. Pavlov's noticed that dog secrets saliva on viewing the food attender and it inspired him to conduct the experiment. Then he arranged a bell in the hall and the bell was rung each time when the attendant arrived. Later the result was that the neutral stimulus food was replaced by the unconditioned stimulus (bell) and reaction (saliva) was obtained.
Answer:
The Roman concept of the citizen evolved during the Roman Republic and changed significantly during the later Roman Empire. After the Romans freed themselves from the Etruscans, they established a republic, and all males over 15 who were descended from the original tribes of Rome became citizens. Citizens of Rome distinguished themselves from slaves and other noncitizens by wearing a toga; most wore a white toga. During the Empire, each emperor wore a purple toga to distinguish himself as the princeps, or "first citizen."
Citizenship varied greatly. The full citizen could vote, marry freeborn persons, and practice commerce. Some citizens were not allowed to vote or hold public office, but maintained the other rights. A third type of citizen could vote and practive commerce, but could not hold office or marry freeborn women.
In the late Republic, male slaves who were granted their freedom could become full citizens. Around 90 B.C.E., non-Roman allies of the Republic gained the rights of citizenship, and by 212 C.E, under the Edict of Caracalla, all free people of the Roman Empire could become citizens.
Explanation:
Answer: Ultramares corporation v. Touche established Ultramares doctrine. Hochfelder v. Ernst & Ernst ruled that scienter is required before CPAs can be held liable.
Explanation:
All the options except the above are true. Ultramares corporation v. Touche did establish the Ultramares doctrine.
United States v. Natelli sentenced two CPAs to prison for a year, in addition to fines, for violating the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Bily v. Arthur Young did not uphold the restatement doctrine. The restatement doctrine restatement doctrine makes an auditor liable to people who rely on the quality of his work be they his clients or third parties. Two high courts ruled that auditors are not liable to third parties who use their work but only to the party that contracted their work.
However, Hochfelder v. Ernst & Ernst ruled that an allegation of scienter (an intention to deceive) is not required before CPAs can be held liable as long as the actions constitute actual deception.
While rule 10b-5 of the Exchange Act states the presence of scienter as a requirement to commit an offense, the court ruled against the statute by eliminating the Scienter clause from criminal statute and ruled against Ernst & Ernst.
Answer:
cant really see it that well but
1. it has alot of destruction in it
2. cant really see them(sorry)
3. the title is no-o-o(unless it's different and I just cant see it) I believe the author put that as the title because it shows anger and despair
4. to show how badly the Indians were treated and the author wanted to show how they might of felt through drawings.
5. yes because the indians were wronged by others because they were just simply nice at heart. that was simply their nature and others took advantage of that.
6. I would think it is negative because it shows alot of negative emotions
hope that helped and if it did pls mark brainiest:)
