Please help ASAP, I'll mark brainliest.

English

1 answer:

stepan [7]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

The first option

Explanation:

The other two options are unprofessional and the reasoning is unreliable. Let's use the process of elimination.

In the second option, the speaker states that since the charity gives a thank-you card, they must be reliable and care about people. This is ineffective reasoning as a thank-you card does not guarantee that the charity cares.

In the third option, the speaker is seemingly trying to convince who they're talking to that their option is the best and they are not giving valid reasoning.

The first option is the only option that makes a promise without coming across as unprofessional or overly convincing.

You might be interested in

III. Write sentence, fragment, or run-on beside each line. Rewrite the fragments and run-ons as proper sentences. 1. She ate. 2.

tia_tia [17]

Answer:

1. SF 2. S 3. RO 4. SF

Explanation:

1. not a full sentence

2. makes sense on its own

3. 2 sentences with no punctuation

4. not a full sentence

7 0

2 years ago

Then the animals assailed the donkey for spoiling what could possibly have been a pleasure to them, on a mere suspicion that the

kodGreya [7K]

The correct answer is B.

Using indirect dialogue allows Twain to compress and shorten the conversation. By using fewer words (instead of including the exact dialogue), Twain can keep the scene short and move on to a more interesting part of the story.

If the dialogue were written out exactly as it was spoken, it would take a lot longer to read, since many animals are speaking to the donkey in this scene.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Rochelle tripped over her brother's skateboard, that is why she was mad at him.

Yuri [45]

i believe it is a sentence fragment and subject verb disagreement

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How does the phrase “glinting like an armful of dimes” create imagery

Anna007 [38]

Answer:c