1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alborosie
3 years ago
5

Porfa, no entiendo como se hace

Law
1 answer:
kkurt [141]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Mira la respuesta a continuación

Explanation:

En una democracia, cada individuo tiene derechos a la libertad que van desde el habla, el movimiento, la asociación, la vida, etc. Sin embargo, las leyes hechas por las autoridades de un estado son vinculantes para todos los ciudadanos de ese estado. La autonomía no debe confundirse con rebelión e insubordinación. Ningún individuo está por encima de la ley y no hay libertad para la desobediencia de las leyes hechas por la autoridad de un estado.

Además, no hay licencia para que la autoridad infrinja los derechos de las personas. Es por eso que existe el derecho a la libertad de audiencia imparcial. Los ciudadanos pueden demandar a la autoridad si presentan leyes que están en contra de las personas. Las personas, en este caso, pueden ejercer sus derechos.

Por lo tanto, es cierto que en una sociedad que funciona democráticamente, cualquier oposición planteada por el autor puede ser superada porque tanto el individuo como la autoridad tienen derecho a una audiencia imparcial en el tribunal de justicia.

You might be interested in
If you get stopped by a cop when you are walking on the sidewalk do you have to identify yourself?
Eduardwww [97]
No, not unless they have reason to be suspicion
7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Tell me sum funny and you get points and blrainliest
Tasya [4]

Answer:

Yo mama so dum when I said it was chilly outside she bought a bowl

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
You think to escape my question!!!!!
Arisa [49]

have a nice day haha

5 0
3 years ago
HELP ME PLSSSSSS ITS FOR A TEST PLSSS HELP
trasher [3.6K]

I’m almost completely sure it B

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If you were a defense attorney, what would you want the jurors to know about the limits of forensic evidence?
OlgaM077 [116]

The results indicate that the 10 pieces of evidence mock jurors reported would be most important when deciding a verdict are (in order of importance): (1) DNA, (2) fingerprints, (3) weapon, (4) video records, (5) crime-scene photos, (6) gunshot residue, (7) other bodily secretions, (8) video confession, (9) forensic ...

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 5O POINTS! URGENT! I need some help with these questions:
    8·2 answers
  • What is John’s designation? John has commanded his troops to defeat the attacking country’s army. He has also declared a nationa
    5·1 answer
  • 38. How many justices/judges are on the Supreme Court? *
    8·1 answer
  • Raleigh, a 55-year-old experienced sales representative at BigCo, is terminated and replaced with Connelly at a lower pay rate.
    5·1 answer
  • What happens when you file a lawsuit?
    5·1 answer
  • Who has a basketball game tomorrow and position are they playing
    7·2 answers
  • What is another word for RECIDIVIST
    8·1 answer
  • An important duty of the president is
    11·2 answers
  • What is check fraud?
    5·1 answer
  • the u.s. supreme court enabled which government practices to continue in its ruling in plessy v. ferguson?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!