1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alborosie
4 years ago
5

Porfa, no entiendo como se hace

Law
1 answer:
kkurt [141]4 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Mira la respuesta a continuación

Explanation:

En una democracia, cada individuo tiene derechos a la libertad que van desde el habla, el movimiento, la asociación, la vida, etc. Sin embargo, las leyes hechas por las autoridades de un estado son vinculantes para todos los ciudadanos de ese estado. La autonomía no debe confundirse con rebelión e insubordinación. Ningún individuo está por encima de la ley y no hay libertad para la desobediencia de las leyes hechas por la autoridad de un estado.

Además, no hay licencia para que la autoridad infrinja los derechos de las personas. Es por eso que existe el derecho a la libertad de audiencia imparcial. Los ciudadanos pueden demandar a la autoridad si presentan leyes que están en contra de las personas. Las personas, en este caso, pueden ejercer sus derechos.

Por lo tanto, es cierto que en una sociedad que funciona democráticamente, cualquier oposición planteada por el autor puede ser superada porque tanto el individuo como la autoridad tienen derecho a una audiencia imparcial en el tribunal de justicia.

You might be interested in
Is an amount of money paid to the court to ensure that the defendant
kupik [55]
A fine , people have to pay so that they ensure the defendant returns for the next court.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If it is it the state who is targeting a group of people, what recourse do they have to achieve justice?
Kazeer [188]

Answer:

Going to the supreme court.

Explanation:

If the state who is targeting a group of people, they have to achieve justice by going to the high court first or supreme court because supreme court has the authority to resolve disputes between two groups on the basis of justice. The supreme court has the authority to stop the state from targeting the specific group of people so the people has the option to go to the court for achieving justice.

3 0
3 years ago
2. What happened to savings in the United States? How did consumers contribute to this change?
Rina8888 [55]

Answer:

What happened to savings in the United States?

Explanation:

The saving rate went from 10% savings rate to a negative savings rate. Consumers did this by binged buying items. Consumers would buy so many things that that weren't necessary, consumers supersized everything they had, instead of saving.

4 0
3 years ago
One purpose of contract law is to determine which agreements are worthy of legal enforcement.
Gelneren [198K]

Answer:

The answer is true

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
The EMT-I/99 is approved to administer invasive procedures.<br><br><br> False<br><br> True
igor_vitrenko [27]

Answer:

True.

Explanation:

6 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why are task forces beneficial for long-term investigations of major cases?
    5·1 answer
  • In appellate procedures, each party files a(n) _____ that contains a short description of a case, a factual summary, legal point
    8·1 answer
  • _7. Multilateralization refers to
    14·1 answer
  • Please hurry !!!
    8·1 answer
  • Polices of human trafficking
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following is an example of procedural law? A. The order in which the steps of a trial take place B. The specific ci
    12·1 answer
  • Why haven’t people developed a perfectly safe Internet?
    9·2 answers
  • What is a brainly warning?
    15·2 answers
  • Without any relevant defense or reason, T punches V from behind. This is a(n) . . .
    6·1 answer
  • Similarities between arbitration and mediation?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!