Which abolitionists were involved in events that increased tensions ahead of the Civil War? Select all that apply.

English

2 answers:

andriy [413]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

C) Dred Scott

Explanation:

Some of the events of the 1850s made the two two regions to feel that they had different values. These occasions diminished their sentiment of being basically like each other. A few instances of this were the Fugitive Slave Act, Preston Brooks' assault on Charles Sumner, and the Dred Scott decision . None of these occasions unmistakably hurt the North or the South. Be that as it may, they played up contrasts in dispositions between the two.

Nonamiya [84]3 years ago

3 0

<h2><u>Answer:</u></h2>

The correct option is C (Dred Scott)

<h3><u>Explanation:</u></h3>

Dred Scott was a slave and social lobbyist who served a few experts previously suing for his opportunity. His case made it to the Supreme Court (Dred Scott v. Sandford) before the American Civil War.

The American Civil War was a war battled in the United States from 1861 to 1865, between the North and the South. The Civil War is the most considered and expounded on scene in U.S. history.

You might be interested in

Which line from stanza two in the poem "When You Are Old" represents a shift in the author's tone?

IceJOKER [234]

D ill go with that your changing face

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What role did the spanish civil war play in preparing for world war 2

lukranit [14]

Answer: the Spanish civil wars is sometimes a prelude to world war 2 germany and Italy supported Franco’s nationalist

Explanation: So basically Germany was supporting Franco’s nation and the Spanish people was cool wit them and they wanted to go to war wit them

3 0

2 years ago

His hockey career came to an _______________ end because of knee problems.

likoan [24]

Abrupt end because of knee problems?

4 0

3 years ago

Helpppoo please I’ll give brainliest

melomori [17]

1/5 is the answer

Hope it helps!

3 0

2 years ago

President Franklin Roosevelt is usually highly regarded as a President by historians for leading the country out of the Great De

yulyashka [42]

Answer:

In moderation, yes.

Explanation:

President FDR was surely a great president for what he did for Americans in the 1940s. Forcing Japanese internment camps are not one of his greatest contributions in our history living modernly, but back in the 40s it was not so frowned upon. If we, in modern days, looked back on this moment, we can see FDR was not so different than Hitler for forcing Japanese Americans out their homes and into camps. However, when we look back at the actions during WWII and we understand America's relationship with Japan and the unease it caused Americans, we may be able to sympathize with FDR and understand why he made that decision. He should be criticized for his actions, but those who criticize him should also understand why he made the decision he made.

*Hopefully this is what you're looking for. Good Luck!*

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers