Why did the French establish settlements along the Great Lakes and the St. Lawrence?

1 answer:

8 0

The French settled along the St. Lawrence River and the Great Lakes for a few reasons.

France arrived late to the New World after Spain, therefore Samuel de Champlain moved north and up the St. Lawrence River. Trying to find the Northwest Passage to Asia, Champlain moved west around the Great Lakes.

France sent few settlers to the Americas. Only male missionaries and fur traders stayed in the new land. Therefore, not many sustainable settlements were needed. Fur traders trapped where they needed to. Missionaries interacted and traded with the Native Americans such as the Huron.

You might be interested in

Match the labels to each location on the map

olga55 [171]

I think this is right

4 0

2 years ago

How did the plebeians gain the right to vote and hold political office in the Roman Republic

igomit [66]

They threatened to leave Rome and build a new city.

5 0

3 years ago

Which best states the main difference between a monopoly and pure competition?

ZanzabumX [31]

Under pure competition there are large number of buyers and sellers, homogeneous products and free entry and exit. Whereas under Monopoly there is a single

3 0

4 years ago

The British East India Company had taken over India by the 1550s. the 1650s the 1750s. the 1850s.

cluponka [151]

The British East India Company had taken over India by 1750s.

Further Explanations:

The East India Company established its trade association in India after defeating the Portuguese and managing to get a grant of concession on trade form Mughals. The main intention of the company was to abuse the economy and establish their society in India. The company’s establishment was put to effect by enforcing a Royal charter on 31st December 1600. More stress was on the Spice Trade of East India.

The Company was syndicate of Governor of Britain and entrepreneur of traders of London Trading involved in East Indies. It used all its bases to establish monopoly in India.It allied with Marathas and other rivals of Mughal, to weaken them and even bribed the generals of the Empire to ruin their administration.The company continued its monopoly in India until 1857. Revolt of 1857 changed the overall supremacy of the company. “Government of India act’ 1858, transferred the authority from the company to British crown with institution of a new British Government headed by Throne.

Learn More

In-state court, a losing party can appeal a case if a jury is unable to make a decision. a judge disagrees with a jury’s decision. a precedent does not exist. a higher court agrees to hear it.?brainly.com/question/2416938
How did the decision the Supreme Court reached in Texas v. Johnson affect the protections offered by the first amendment? brainly.com/question/240143
The impact of Furman v. Georgia (1972) was that states had to promise to use the death penalty only with approval from the Supreme Court. Throw out the old Miranda warning and write a new one. Agree to throw out all state laws regarding crime and impose national standards?brainly.com/question/637963

Answer Details-

Grade: High School

Subject: History

Chapter: East India Company

Keywords:

East India Company, Governor, Britain, East Indies, South-East Asia ,India, Spice trade, East India, Portuguese, Mughals, Marathas, Royal charter,Spice Trade,entrepreneur

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

All of the following were true of the Iranian Revolution EXCEPT that

myrzilka [38]

All of the following were true of the Iranian Revolution except that E. It reflected pro foreign sentiment.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers