Answer:
variable cost per bushel = $0.18848
total fixed costs = $6,652
Explanation:
we can use the high-low method of accounting to determine the variable and fixed costs:
- highest activity cost = $25,500
- highest activity level = 100,000 bushels
- lowest activity cost = $7,500 (*doesn't make sense to use $75,000)
- lowest activity level = 4,500
variable cost per unit = (highest activity cost - lowest activity cost) / (highest activity units - lowest activity units)
variable cost per unit = ($25,500 - $7,500) / (100,000 - 4,500) = $18,000 / 95,500 bushels = $0.18848 per bushel, since the quantities are large, we cannot round up
fixed costs = highest activity cost - (variable cost x highest activity units)
fixed costs = $25,500 - ($0.18848 x 100,000) = $6,652
This is true. She can learn the rules of the game, terms used, top tennis players, types of courts played on, the various tournaments, her favorite players.
Many people cannot play sports very well but still can be avid fans of the sport! Thank goodness!
Answer:
c. $4,000
Explanation:
The computation of the depreciation expense for year 2 under straight-line method is shown below:
= (Original cost - residual value) ÷ (useful life)
= ($25,000 - $5,000) ÷ (5 years)
= ($20,000) ÷ (5 years)
= $4,000
In this method, the depreciation is same for all the remaining useful life i.e $4,000 is charged for remaining three years
Answer:
For both 10,000 units and 20,000 units, the best alternative is Vendor B
Explanation:
Using the information provided in the question, we can write the following:
Annual Volume of 10,000 units
Internal Alternative 1
Variable costs = 170,000 (we multiply the variable cost per unit by total units)
Fixed costs = 20,000
Total costs = 370,000
Internal Alternative 2
Variable costs = 140,000
Fixed costs = 240,000
Total costs = 380,000
Vendor A
Total cost = 200,000 (we simply multiply the price by the quantity)
Vendor B
Total cost = 180,000
Vendor C
Total cost = 190,000
The cheapest option is Vendor B
Now for the 20,000 units:
Internal Alternative 1
Variable costs = 340,000
Fixed costs = 200,000
Total costs = 540,000
Internal Alternative 2
Variable costs = 280,000
Fixed costs = 240,000
Total costs = 520,000
Vendor A
Total cost = 400,000
Vendor B
Total cost = 360,000
Vendor C
Total cost = 380,000
Therefore, Vendor B is once again, the cheapest alternative.
Answer:
Dividend growth rate anticipated = 14.66%
Explanation:
Using dividend growth model we have
P
= ![\frac{D{_1}}{K{_e} - g}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7BD%7B_1%7D%7D%7BK%7B_e%7D%20-%20g%7D)
Where P
= Current market price = $120
D
= Dividend to be paid at year end or next year = $1.37
K
= Expected return on equity = 15.8%
g = Expected growth rate
Now putting values we have
$120 = ![\frac{1.37}{0.158 - g}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B1.37%7D%7B0.158%20-%20g%7D)
0.158 - g = ![\frac{1.37}{120} = 0.0114](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B1.37%7D%7B120%7D%20%3D%200.0114)
0.158 - 0.0114 = g
0.1466 = g = 14.66%