1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ElenaW [278]
3 years ago
14

Chuck Diesel Burger is a food truck in Houston, Texas. Imagine that Chuck Diesel Burger’s minimum average total cost (ATC) is $3

.75 and that its minimum average variable cost (AVC) is $2.50. Assume there are no barriers to entry into or exit from the food-truck market. Chuck Diesel Burger will suffer a loss but still produce if the price is equal to:
$4.00.$3.75.$3.00.$2.50.$2.00.
Business
1 answer:
Trava [24]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The answer is: $3.00

Explanation:

In order for Chuck Diesel Burger to make a profit it must sell its product at ˃$3.75.

If it sells its product at $3.75 it will break even (costs = revenue).

If its price is <3.75 but ˃$2.50 it will lose money but still produce, since its revenue is ˃ than its variable cost.

Any price ≤$2.50 would make it impossible for Chuck Diesel Burger to continue production since its revenue is < variable production costs.

You might be interested in
Game theory is useful in analyzing oligopoly behavior because: advertising is so common among oligopoly firms. it explains why o
hoa [83]
I think the answer is trying<span> to maximize profits is essentially a game in all types of markets. Oligopoly is focused on monopolizing all the markets by gaining much profit that would make it dominate the businesses. This can help players understand strategic skills in marketing.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Hayden Company expects its November sales to be 20% higher than its October sales of $160,000. All sales are on credit and are c
8_murik_8 [283]
The awnser is a choose a
4 0
3 years ago
Colil Computer Systems, Inc., manufactures printer circuit cards. All direct materials are added at the inception of the product
bonufazy [111]
他們會不會覺得不得不承認是自己的問題,他們會不會覺得
7 0
2 years ago
Karl Corporation was organized on January 2, 2018. During 2018, Karl issued 40,000 shares at $24 per share, purchased 6,000 shar
labwork [276]

Answer:

The answer is $1,404,000

Explanation:

Total amount realized from the issuance: 40,000 shares x $24

= $960,000

Treasury stock repurchased:

6,000 shares x $26

=$156,000

Net income = $600,000

The total amount of stockholders' equity at December 31, 2018 is:

Net income + amount realized from issuance - amount of treasury stock

$600,000 + $960,000 - $156,000

$1,404,000

3 0
3 years ago
Suppose that the S&amp;P 500, with a beta of 1.0, has an expected return of 13% and T-bills provide a risk-free return of 4%. a.
Aleksandr [31]

Answer:

a. The answers are as follows:

(i) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 4%; and Beta of Portfolio = 0

(ii) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 6.25%; and Beta of Portfolio = 0.25

(iii) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 8.50%; and Beta of Portfolio = 0.50

(iv) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 10.75%; and Beta of Portfolio = 0.75

(v) Expected of Return of Portfolio = 13%; and Beta of Portfolio = 1.0

b. Change in expected return = 9% increase

Explanation:

Note: This question is not complete as part b of it is omitted. The complete question is therefore provided before answering the question as follows:

Suppose that the S&P 500, with a beta of 1.0, has an expected return of 13% and T-bills provide a risk-free return of 4%.

a. What would be the expected return and beta of portfolios constructed from these two assets with weights in the S&P 500 of (i) 0; (ii) 0.25; (iii) 0.50; (iv) 0.75; (v) 1.0

b. How does expected return vary with beta? (Do not round intermediate calculations.)

The explanation to the answers are now provided as follows:

a. What would be the expected return and beta of portfolios constructed from these two assets with weights in the S&P 500 of (i) 0; (ii) 0.25; (iii) 0.50; (iv) 0.75; (v) 1.0

To calculate these, we use the following formula:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (WS&P * RS&P) + (WT * RT) ………… (1)

Beta of Portfolio = (WS&P * BS&P) + (WT * BT) ………………..………………. (2)

Where;

WS&P = Weight of S&P = (1) – (1v)

RS&P = Return of S&P = 13%, or 0.13

WT = Weight of T-bills = 1 – WS&P

RT = Return of T-bills = 4%, or 0.04

BS&P = 1.0

BT = 0

After substituting the values into equation (1) & (2), we therefore have:

(i) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 0 (i.e. WS&P = 0)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (0 * 0.13) + ((1 - 0) * 0.04) = 0.04, or 4%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (0 * 1.0) + ((1 - 0) * 0) = 0

(ii) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 0.25 (i.e. WS&P = 0.25)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (0.25 * 0.13) + ((1 - 0.25) * 0.04) = 0.0625, or 6.25%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (0.25 * 1.0) + ((1 - 0.25) * 0) = 0.25

(iii) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 0.50 (i.e. WS&P = 0.50)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (0.50 * 0.13) + ((1 - 0.50) * 0.04) = 0.0850, or 8.50%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (0.50 * 1.0) + ((1 - 0.50) * 0) = 0.50

(iv) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 0.75 (i.e. WS&P = 0.75)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (0.75 * 0.13) + ((1 - 0.75) * 0.04) = 0.1075, or 10.75%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (0.75 * 1.0) + ((1 - 0.75) * 0) = 0.75

(v) Expected return and beta of portfolios with weights in the S&P 500 of 1.0 (i.e. WS&P = 1.0)

Using equation (1), we have:

Expected of Return of Portfolio = (1.0 * 0.13) + ((1 – 1.0) * 0.04) = 0.13, or 13%

Using equation (2), we have:

Beta of Portfolio = (1.0 * 1.0) + (1 – 1.0) * 0) = 1.0

b. How does expected return vary with beta? (Do not round intermediate calculations.)

There expected return will increase by the percentage of the difference between Expected Return and Risk free rate. That is;

Change in expected return = Expected Return - Risk free rate = 13% - 4% = 9% increase

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Harry needs to make a presentation on endangered species of animals. Which presentation software elements can he use to display
    14·2 answers
  • Nov. 5 Purchased 1,100 units of product at a cost of $40 per unit. Terms of the sale are 5/10, n/60; the invoice is dated Novemb
    5·1 answer
  • An employee receives an hourly rate of $30, with time and a half for all hours worked in excess of 40 during a week. payroll dat
    11·1 answer
  • A person arrives at a restaurant claiming to be a health inspector. what should the manager ask for
    7·1 answer
  • . Gibson Company sales for the year 2019 were $4.5 million. The firm’s variable operating cost ratio was 0.45 and fixed costs (t
    8·1 answer
  • The creation of a new product goes through several stages. At the _______ phase, a product idea is presented to a sample of pote
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following will cause an increase in ROI? An increase in controllable fixed costs. An increase in average operating
    5·1 answer
  • Following are account balances (in millions of dollars) from a recent State annual report, followed by several typical transacti
    6·1 answer
  • Entries to Correct Errors The following errors took place in journalizing and posting transactions: Insurance of $20,000 paid fo
    11·1 answer
  • Jericho Snacks is an all-equity firm with estimated earnings before interest and taxes of $624,000 annually forever. Currently,
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!