Answer:
Option B. It is unrealistic
Explanation:
The reason is that the people have different likes which means we will never see 100 percent acceptance from the customers which might in the way of rejecting the offer of Gary. So the assumption that 50,000 cab drivers will purchase its product is truly optimistic which in other words is unrealistic assumption. So the option B is correct.
Option A is incorrect because the assumption is less qualitative as it doesn't relies on realistic assumption.
The cab drivers sales are relevant here but the sales assumption was unrealistic (Highly optimistic assumption) so the option C and D are incorrect.
Option E is also incorrect because the sales to cab drivers can be measure by initially directly selling 1000 cell phone to 1000 cab drivers which will give an actual idea of sales units expected, which means it is measurable.
Answer: False
Explanation:
Question mentions that even though Worker A and Worker B are both paid the same salary and become less effective as their workload increase, Worker A is still more effective than Worker B.
The optimal allocation therefore would be one where Worker A get more of the 200 units of production than Worker B because they would be able to produce more as they are more effective.
Answer:
<h2>C. Makes domestic consumer worse off. </h2>
Explanation:
A tariff is levied on the exports and imports between two countries. It is meant to regulate the foreign trade and encourage the domestic industries and safeguard them from the competition of foreign goods. Tariffs are source of income for states. Tariffs and import export quotas are most used instruments of protectionism. Tariffs are fixed or variable.
It can put the domestic consumer in an advantageous position as due to tariffs they would not be able to get less costly products.
Answer: 299750
Explanation:
Based on no-arbitrage approach, future price should be equal to spot price compounded by risk-free rate.
Spot price = $110
Risk-free rate = 9%
Future price = 110*(1+9%) = 119.9
For 2500 shares = 119.9*2500 = 299750
