1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
crimeas [40]
3 years ago
15

When you find both a solid and a broken yellow line between opposing lanes of traffic, you must NOT pass. True or false?

Social Studies
1 answer:
IRISSAK [1]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

if the solid yellow line is on your side.

Explanation:

Yellow lines painted in the center of a road indicate that traffic on that road is two-way, that is, on that stay the cars drive in both directions of direction, each direction on one side of the lines. You may have noticed that sometimes these lines are broken and sometimes the lines are solid, and sometimes the road has a broken line next to a solid line. What does this mean? Well, when the road has two broken lines it means that cars on both sides can move to the opposite lane. If both lines are solid, it is forbidden for any car to pass to the opposite lane.

If the road has a solid line and a broken line, it is only allowed to pass to the next lane, the car on the side of the broken line, the car on the side of the solid line cannot pass.

You might be interested in
Monplace Right and Laws
djverab [1.8K]

<u>Answer: </u>

The Family and Medical Leave Act says that the replaced workers must be given a similar position in the same company with the same pay as their old jobs.

Option: (A)

<u>Explanation: </u>

  • The Family and Medical Act of 1993 guarantees job security for the employees who seek long-term leave owing to medical conditions like pregnancy, accidental injuries or other health disorders.
  • For the protection of this act to be applicable, the employee has to serve in the same organization for at least 12 months and complete a minimum of 1250 hours of working.

3 0
3 years ago
A benefit of cohabitation is that Group of answer choices the partners won't have to deal with pressure to marry. the partners w
saveliy_v [14]

A benefit of cohabitation is that the partners won't have to deal with pressure to marry.

<h3>What is Cohabitation?</h3>
  • By defining each partner's rights and obligations, a cohabitation agreement can make the process of divorcing considerably easier.
  • By doing this, the likelihood of disagreements over money and other specifics can be decreased, and any conflicts can be resolved amicably without resorting to legal action.
  • Living together before getting married has the advantage of allowing one to get to know each other better, enhancing the ability to solve problems together, strengthening the bond, and enhancing the relationship's resilience to stress, all of which can give some more confidence in the decision to get married.
  • Their inertia argument states that cohabitation, as opposed to dating without cohabitation, improves the likelihood of marriage, in part because there are more incentives to stay together once a couple starts living together.

To learn more about Cohabitation refer to:

brainly.com/question/12882310

#SPJ4

4 0
2 years ago
SOMEONE ANSWER THIS ILL BRAINLIST
Usimov [2.4K]
Answer: C. and D.
Building codes are meant to protect public health and safety; these answers would make the most sense.
8 0
3 years ago
Which statement best describes the impact of the Gideon decision?
cluponka [151]

Answer:

All people, whether wealthy or not, now have the same rights in court

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
(Consider This) For people that use commitment contracts to motivate achievement of a goal, people have the choice of their pena
Naya [18.7K]

Answer: A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss  aversion will provide additional motivation .

Options:

A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss

aversion will provide additional motivation

B. designating a charity should be more effective because it avoids all potential for loss

C. it shouldn’t matter whether one designates a charity or anti-charity

D. self-interest biases generally keep people from choosing the anti-charity

Explanation:

The study of behavioral Economics shows that people are more driven by the loss of fear than the hope of gain. This is known as loss aversion. In commitment contracts where penalty money is promised to a charity or an anti-charity if the goal is not achieved, those who promise their money to an anti-charity tend to achieve their goals more. The same also applies when comparing this group and those who do not have to forego anything if they do not meet their target.

This is because giving to a charity will still seem beneficial while losing the money to an anti-charity will seem like a total loss.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which type of jurisdiction do federal trial courts have​
    5·2 answers
  • What procedures must be described in an agreement called an assurance of compliance with ohrp?
    8·1 answer
  • What would be the most likely effect of the Maryland General Assembly passing a law to reduce vehicle emissions? a Fewer people
    14·2 answers
  • Public policy concerning the Colorado River affects all of the following states EXCEPT which one?
    11·2 answers
  • Hi! I need a little help you get to be brainliest! :) Religon is a set of beliefs about a god or gods.
    14·2 answers
  • Ana has explored different identities and has committed to one. She is showing what type of identity status, according to Marcia
    15·1 answer
  • What are laws that protect victims of human trafficking​
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following can help you appreciate the actions of someone from
    13·1 answer
  • Archaeologists have uncovered evidence that cities in ancient India were well organized and sanitary. Which statements below sup
    10·2 answers
  • Write a brief note on socialization ​
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!