Answer:
this perspective is inaccurate because characters using informal language doesn’t mean that they’re unintelligent.
Explanation:
it’s the same thing for formal language. there’s a time and place for both informal and formal language. if a bunch of characters are friends and hanging out, then they’d want to use informal language with each other. informal language can also be more realistic to use for characters. for example if all characters in a book are in high school, it would be really unrealistic to have all of them use formal language and walking around talking like they're in a job interview.
those critics are assuming that informal language = unintelligent characters when that is just not true. characters can be intelligent and still use informal language because that’s normal for them or they’re in a place with people where using informal language is better.
I think that 20% of smokers wanting to quit smoking would be too narrow because that is only 20 people out of 1,000,000 that want to quit smoking versus 90% of people that would lie to quit.
Answer:
She uses facts from a reliable source. I think
Answer: No characters don't have to be likable. There could be a connection because it could be what you see in yourself. Reflection almost.
Explanation:
The reader can often relate to the unlikable character because the character resembles a part of the reader. Hope this helps!
The simple predicate is the one, main verb that is the action being performed. So here it would be the word “featured”.
