A. Both influenced modern-day legal systems.
Members of the 3rd Estate in France had all sorts of reasons to dislike the king and queen -- King Louis XVI and Queen Marie Antoinette -- in the days leading up to the French Revolution. Let me count the ways (well, a few of them):
1. Louis XVI was not a kingly figure. He preferred to be out in the woods hunting or at a workbench taking apart a clock than doing the tasks of royal government. He wasn't the sort of person to inspire the confidence of the people in him.
2. Marie Antoinette was an Austrian princess, and the French people despised the Austrians. France and Austria had been enemies for years, and this attempt to bring the two countries together through a marriage wasn't popular with the people.
3. Louis and Marie had sex problems. You'd think that would be a private matter, but when you're the king and queen it's your job to produce an heir to the throne, and they weren't managing to do that.
4. Both Louis and Marie spent way too much money -- money that came from the taxpayers (the members of the 3rd Estate). Louis spent it on the lavish palace life of Versailles and on wars. (His government had given a huge loan to the Americans to help them fight vs. Britain.) Marie spent money on frills and dresses and jewelry and whatnot.
5. They didn't seem to know the people's situation or care about them much. They didn't want to be bothered with concerns about the poor people of France.
I could keep counting more ways, but that's enough for now!
In between hindu and muslims the politicians are taking advantage. Some are supporting hindus for gaining votes whereas some are supporting muslims.
The answer is C make me brainliest answer pleasse
Answer:
The superpower that has better economic conditions will maintain more friendships.
Explanation:
In the quote shown above, we can see that Clay reinforces the idea that the nation that has a greater amount of food, allowing the population and allies to have a support in the supply of food, will achieve more friendships within Europe. The capacity of a nation to feed is a result of its economic condition. In this case, Clay affirms that the economic condition of the two powers is essential for them to establish friendly relations between other nations.
