Finding new labor to replace slavery.
Answer: Physical illness and decreased self-actualization.
Explanation:
They are things considered that boasts the health system of individuals. Most of them are having money available for their needs, prestige and a proper care of their body system. Not putting these into consideration would have the individual not having a proper care for themselves and have lowered confidence in most cases.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached nor context or specific references, we can say the following.
Who is most likely to embrace consequentialism?
The people who embrace consequentialism are the people who tend to believe that making the right thing is going to make them happy and is going to fulfill an internal desire. We are talking that follows the teachings and principles of Utilitarianism, a theory developed by John Stewart Mill.
This concept indicates that people will be happy if they do something that is correct and provides satisfaction to them. Or the opposite, they will be sad if they do something wrong.
It is a want because it is not needed
Answer: when your depret to get points cuz your account got delted
Explanation: On April 22, 1793, President George Washington issued a Neutrality Proclamation to define the policy of the United States in response to the spreading war in Europe. “The duty and interest of the United States require,” the Proclamation stated, “that they [the United States] should with sincerity and good faith adopt and pursue a conduct friendly and impartial toward the belligerent Powers.” The Proclamation warned Americans that the federal government would prosecute any violations of this policy by its citizens, and would not protect them should they be tried by a belligerent nation. This statement of policy triggered a fierce reaction from those who considered it a sellout of the nation’s revolutionary soul for the financial gain of the merchant class. “The cause of France is the cause of man, and neutrality is desertion,” one anonymous correspondent wrote the president. Critics believed that the Proclamation marked a dishonorable betrayal of our oldest and dearest ally and to a sacred alliance made in the darkest hours of the American Revolution. The Proclamation was important for the constitutional precedent it established in the exertion of executive authority in the realm of foreign policy, as well as for exciting partisan passions that were formative to the creation of political parties in the first party system.
Several important recent developments in both American and Europe led to Washington’s Neutrality Proclamation. The French Revolution turned more radical when it beheaded King Louis XVI in January 1793. Ten days later, revolutionary France, already fighting Austria and Prussia, declared war on England, Holland, and Spain, embroiling the entire European continent in conflict. Lastly, on April 8, 1793 the new French minister, Edmond Genet, arrived in Charleston, South Carolina. Genet was an instant hit with the American people who flocked in large numbers to greet the ebullient Frenchmen as he made his way north to the capital in Philadelphia. More ominous, however, was the fact that Genet, armed with commissions and letters of marque from his government, actively recruited Americans to fight for revolutionary France.