Question

after learning about the difference between a king as a ruler or a president as a representative of the people which would you prefer and why explain your opinion and support your argument with evidence

Answer 1

I would rather have a President over a King because with a president you can say no and take votes, but with a king, he decides all of the rules.

Answer 2

A president. You became a king out of pure luck. The monarchy is set up so that one family will rule. When a king came into power their main focus was producing an heir to help the population relax. To know that there would be another king. However sometimes it took years. And if you take Henery VIII he changed an entities nations religion just so that he could divorce his wife because he believed that she would not provide him with a son. Now if you look at a preisdent. Their time in power seems much more stable. A president is chosen not born. They are voted by the people. Democracy works better because everyone gets a voice. If you don’t like s president you only have to wait four years to get rid of them. If you want to get rid of a king you don’t have any idea of how long you have to wait. That is why presidents are better than kings. Plus they can’t just kill people because they feel like it