The American Revolution was not a civil war because a “civil war” is typically between two groups within the same country. For instance, Parliament and the King fought each other in the English Civil War. Similar conflicts occurred between the Union and the Confederacy during the American Civil War.
Contrarily, the American Revolution was a conflict between a colonizer and a colony. Usually, these are not referred to as "civil wars," but rather as "rebellions," "revolts," or (to their supporters) "wars of liberation."
Any of these might constitute a "revolution," so long as it alters society, the economy, and culture fundamentally as well as the leadership. As you can expect, this makes the word "revolution" very political. The proponents of change refer to it as a "revolution," whilst the opponents use a less admirable term.
The Civil War would have been referred to as a "revolution" if the Confederacy had prevailed, and the Union may have even done so at some point. Instead, it fell short, and now we refer to the conflict of 1861–1865 as a civil war. It's just another instance of how the winners write history.
Answer:
You can use perspective in all points of view to help define your narrator's attitude and personality. The character's perspective affects how he feels about certain experiences or other characters.
Explanation:
The one that makes the most sense to me would be C...
Hope this helps ^-^
Answer:
The United States exercises its foreign policy through economic aid. ... In the years after World War II, the United States was guided generally by containment — the policy of keeping communism from spreading beyond the countries already under its influence.
Explanation:
ANSWER:
the answer is A) karl marx
~batmans wife dun dun dun..aka ~serenitybella
