What are Siena, Florence, Lucca, Venice, and Genoa? Please answer asap!

1 answer:

3 0

The correct answer is - 1. Self-governing city-states, in areas of the Holy Roman Empire, that had wealthy merchant families and industries known for banking, jewelry making, textiles, and metal working.

After the fall of the Holy Roman Empire, on the territory of Italy had developed multiple small but strong and well organized city-states. Some these city-states were Siena, Florence, Lucca, Venice, and Genoa. These city-states were ruled by wealthy merchant families that had a big regional economic and military power, and they were developing very well and became very rich by the means of banking, production of expensive goods, and trade.

You might be interested in

What does the acronym WHO stand for?

Ymorist [56]

Answer:

<em>WHO = World Health Organization </em>

3 0

3 years ago

Do you think the Assyrians’ almost exclusive reliance on military power was a good strategy for creating their empire? Why or wh

zloy xaker [14]

<span>This is of course somewhat of a subjective question, but in general most would agree that no, this was not a good strategy, since it left no room to form treaties. </span>

8 0

3 years ago

What were the responsibilities of women in 19th century Russia?

Elodia [21]

Answer:

Women could become factory workers, domestic servants (p. 26), physicians, midwives, telegraph workers, and teachers (p. 20). Some could afford to dress more fashionably, to buy books and attend dance halls, pleasure gardens and theatres and there were opportunities for education

4 0

2 years ago

John Quincy has been a citizen of the United States for 8 years. He’s 27 years old. If John decides to run for Congress, what ar

shepuryov [24]

It would be C. You have to be 30 years old to run for Senate, but you only have to be 25 years old and a citizen in your state for seven years to run for House. Hope this helps! :)

8 0

3 years ago

What did the escape of shah reza pahlavi lead to in Iran

Roman55 [17]

Shah Reza Pahlavi was a brutal dictator, but his departure did not mean Iran was more free. The Shah was pro-west, and would brutally crack down on any dissent. He was replaced by Ayatollah Khomeini, who helped to install a religous dictatorship in Iran. Everything that the Shah had stood for --- including the western world --- was now seen with open contempt by the government.

4 0

3 years ago