The history of slavery spans many cultures, nationalities, and religions from ancient times to the present day. However the social, economic, and legal positions of slaves were vastly different in different systems of slavery in different times and places.
A monarchy could also be considered a dictatorship then the monarch was absolute and authoritarian.
A monarchy or crown is a reign that is passed down from one generation to the next, whereas a dictatorship is an office that has been obtained via force. But when the monarch turned into a dictatorship, he became the only figurehead in the country. All authority is vested in him. He become absolute and authoritarian.
In such nations, either a monarchy (monarchy) or a dictatorship (dictatorship) are in place, either of which is in charge of the entire nation. Although there are certain exceptions to this rule in a number of nations, both of these regimes are thought to violate citizens' rights. Under these regimes, there is no constitutionally elected government.
To learn more about monarchy here
brainly.com/question/10740346
#SPJ1
<em>B. They believed that Parliament had no right to tax them as they had no direct representation in that legislative body.</em>
Explanation:
The Stamp Act was passed by the British Parliament and was put onto the colonists, this meant that many paper products had a tax on them. This did not make the colonists happy whatsoever.
After the Stamp Act got passed, many colonists were angered by this and thought it was not fair. The colonists had the argument, "taxation without representation", as they had nobody to vouch for them in British Parliament and make sure things were going smoothly. Great Britain argued that the tax money was going towards paying for the French and Indian War, which was very expensive. They also made the point that the colonists were being protected by British soldiers, so they should not complain that they were being taxed.
Even after Great Britain made these points, the colonists still did not want to be taxed and still said it was unfair. Many ended up boycotting paper products and other items that had the tax on them and in some cases, things ended up getting violent. Products ended up getting burned, British merchants were being hurt, the colonists were fed up and wanted the tax to stop.
Eventually, Great Britain realized the Stamp Act was doing more harm than good. Many British merchants were losing money and the colonists were still angered, which caused the Stamp Act to get repealed shortly after.
Answer:
people didn't have to go to as many places or do much to reach information considering it is right here on our phones, computers, tv's, laptops, tablets etc...
Answer:
Explanation:
Just highlight the key points in the document that support this question.
