With the coming about of the tradition<span> of Sufism, </span>Islamic missionary <span>activities increased drastically. I believe is A.</span>
I’ll give you two:
Yes: The “War” on the Indians was not a traditional war of declaration but of skirmishes. When wagon trains of people headed West Indians would commonly target them for raids and pillage, so along many routes forts where built and patrols would try and make sure they were safe. If the problem became worse the local garrison would find the tribe and come with a list of demands. Most of the time they were fired upon arrival out of fear or anger. This would lead to a small battle or skirmish which would likely cause collateral damage.
No: The wars raged in the west against the Indians were that of near genocide, and to call it anything but is misleading. To claim that the slaughter of hundreds of innocent people was a “battle” is absurd and shouldn’t be considered. Though in films that depict such events are dramatized and inaccurate, situations much like those were taking place around the west yearly.
<span>The Muslim troops were under
the leadership of Salah ad-Din (Saladin) an Ayyubid sultan. They had murdered
and enslaved many Crusaders which made the Muslims a great military power in
Jersualem, the Holy Land. They had also captured other cities which sparked
what was then known as the ‘Third Crusade’.</span>
The Answer Is C. I Just took the test and got it right!
